The action or offence of speaking sacrilegiously about God or sacred things; profane talk.
Answer: Yes
Explanation:
Because with the crime it can give us a statics and that will how us how society is. But only using statics.
Answer:
B!!!!!
Explanation:
The Court most recently cited Terry v. Ohio in Arizona v. Johnson. In that 2009 case, the Court ruled 9–0 in favor of further expanding Terry, granting police the ability to frisk an individual in a stopped vehicle if there is reasonable suspicion to believe the individual is armed and dangerous.
Answer:
hair or anything from the body
Explanation:
hair is dna and if you have a smaple of the blood theres some dna too
Answer:
<h2>DEFINETLY C.</h2><h2>im right </h2>
