Answer:
Job analysis skills.
Explanation:
Job analysis is a the ability to identify the detail of a job as well as determine the requirement needed to get such job. It also involves helps to show the importance of certain duties to a job.
Simply put, Job analysis can be defined as the way and manner by which a job's duties and requirements are set for employees.
In the above question, it can be seen that the HR of Superglam is trying to determine duties and employee requirement to enable efficiency of employees in their job posts.
Cheers.
Answer:
1. True
2. a & c
3. b
4. a, b & c
5. a, b & c
Explanation:
When you feel interested in math, it's likely accounting is suitable for you.
please read more articles about accounting in these links
https://www.accountingcoach.com/accounting-principles/explanation
https://studymoose.com/foundational-accounting-principles-and-terminology-essay
https://www.edx.org/course/management-accounting-acca-fma-f2-x-8
Answer:
The correct answer is Inductive reasoning.
Explanation:
Inductive reasoning is a form of reasoning in which the truth of the premises supports the conclusion, but does not guarantee it. A classic example of inductive reasoning is:
- All the crows observed so far have been black
- Therefore, all crows are black
In principle, it could be that the next crow observed is not black. In contrast to deductive reasoning, inductive reasoning has the advantage of being expansive, that is, the conclusion contains more information than is contained in the premises. Given its expansive nature, inductive reasoning is very useful and frequent in science and in everyday life. However, given its fallible nature, its justification is problematic. When are we justified in making an inductive inference, and concluding, for example, that all crows are black from a limited sample of them? What distinguishes a good inductive argument from a bad one? These and other related problems give rise to the problem of induction, whose validity and importance has continued for centuries.
Answer: Option (d) is correct.
Explanation:
Amount paid for candy = $1,500
Items received = 8,500 pieces of candy
Group 1 = 2,500 pieces
Selling price = $0.15 each
sale value = pieces sold × Selling price
= 2,500 × $0.15 each
= $375
Group 2 = 5,500 pieces
Selling price = $0.36 each
sale value = pieces sold × Selling price
= 5,500 × $0.36 each
= $1,980
Group 3 = 500 pieces
Selling price = $0.72 each
sale value = pieces sold × Selling price
= 500 × $0.72 each
= $360
Total sale value = $375 + $1,980 + $360
= $2,715


= 72.92%
Proportion of cost for Group 2 = cost × Percentage of sale in Group 2
= $1,500 × 72.92%
= $1,093.8


= $0.1988
= $0.20(approx)
Answer:
$38,440
Explanation:
Calculation to determine How much of the proceeds, if any, is taxable to Russ
Face value of policy $74,400
Less: Cash Surrender value ($24,800)
Less: Premium paid ($11,160)
Taxable Proceeds $38,440
Therefore the taxable Proceeds are $38,440.