Answer:
1)the feuding families
2) juliets parents
Explanation:
1)you could say that the families longstanding feud was the reason the lovers couldnt be together in the first place and acted as a catalyst to all the disastrous events that followed. If the families had put their feud aside the couple could have married and so the whole thing of juliet faking her death and then romeo killing himself blah blah wouldnt have happened.
2) both juliets parents were incredibly overbearing and her dad was pushing her to marry paris so naturally she couldn't tell him about her wanting to marry romeo. but juliets mother was always distant from her daughter and so if their relationship wasn't as strained perhaps juliet could have discussed her desire to marry romeo with her mother and the families could have possible come to some agreement to allow the lovers to be together and so they wouldnt have died trying to elope
No not all communication serves a positive purpose
Answer:
Twelve years ago, Barack Obama introduced himself to the American public by way of a speech given at the Democratic National Convention, in Boston, in which he declared, “There is not a black America and a white America and Latino America, an Asian America; there’s the United States of America.” Few of us believed this to be true, but most, if not all of us, longed for it to be. We vested this brash optimist with our hope, a resource that was in scarce supply three years after the September 11th terrorist attacks in a country mired in disastrous military conflicts in two nations. The vision he offered—of national reconciliation beyond partisan bounds, of government rooted in respect for the governed and the Constitution itself, of idealism that could actually be realized—became the basis for his Presidential campaign. Twice the United States elected to the Presidency a biracial black man whose ancestry and upbringing stretched to three continents.
At various points that idealism has been severely tested. During his Presidency, we witnessed a partisan divide widen into an impassable trench, and gun violence go unchecked while special interests blocked any regulation. The President was forced to show his birth certificate, which we recognized as the racial profiling of the most powerful man in the world. Obama did not, at least publicly, waver in his contention that Americans were bound together by something greater than what divided them. In July, when he spoke in Dallas after a gunman murdered five police officers, he seemed pained by the weight of this faith, as if stress fractures had appeared in a load-bearing wall.
It is difficult not to see the result of this year’s Presidential election as a refutation of Obama’s creed of common Americanism. And on Wednesday, for the first time in the twelve years that we’ve been watching him, Obama did not seem to believe the words he was speaking to the American public. In the White House Rose Garden, Obama offered his version of a concession speech—an acknowledgement of Donald Trump’s victory. The President attempted gamely to cast Trump’s victory as part of the normal ebb and flow of political fortunes, and as an example of the great American tradition of the peaceful transfer of power. (This was not, it should be recalled, the peaceful transfer of power that most observers were worried about.) He intended, he said, to offer the same courtesy toward Trump that President George W. Bush had offered him, in 2008. Yet that reference only served to highlight the paradox of Obama's Presidency: he now exists in history bracketed by the overmatched forty-third President and the misogynistic racial demagogue who will succeed him as the forty-fifth. During his 2008 campaign, Obama frequently found himself—and without much objection on his part—compared to Abraham Lincoln. He may now share an ambivalent common bond with Lincoln, whose Presidency was bookended by James Buchanan and Andrew Johnson, two lesser lights of American history.
Explanation:
In an average essay, you'll see the following:
- Introduction
- Body paragraphs (about 3)
- Conclusion
That means :
1 + 3 + 1 = 5
About 5 paragraphs is the normal essay length.
Explanation:
A) <em>might </em><em>like</em><em> </em><em>it</em>
<em>I </em><em>think</em><em> </em><em>this</em><em> </em><em>would</em><em> be</em><em> </em><em>correct</em><em>.</em>
