<h2><u>Answer:</u></h2>
Serfs were the laborers of lowest levels in many zones of medieval Europe, however, in some, there were slaves, who were at a lower level. Serfs were not slaves but rather were not allowed to leave the land where they worked.
Their commitment with their medieval master was shared; he had commitments to them, to give a place and ensure them, similarly as they had commitments to him, to give a piece of the product, or later, cash for lease. Serfs couldn't be purchased or sold.
They had a place with the land, not the ruler. In the event that the master sold the land, they ran with it. The new proprietor did not have the alternative of moving them off the land.
a) A doctrine allowing new states to decide the issue of slavery for themselves.
It basically gave states the power to choose whether they wanted to be free or slave states.
World War II devastated not just Japan, but the Korean Peninsula, and in 1945, the United States and the USSR captured the peninsula and ended Japanese rule there. Korea was divided into two occupation zones that were intended to be temporary.
I believe it would be the Viet Minh commander Vo Nguyen Giap.
Hope it helps!
Answer:if there was one then there would be chaos and that country would be destoryed
Explanation:
