Answer:
The firm should pay $46907.57 for the given project.
Explanation:
Given information:
Return = $15000 annually
Time = 5 years
Opportunity cost = 18%
The formula for payment is
where, R is return, OC is opportunity cost, t is time in years.
Substitute R=15000, t=5 and OC=0.18 in the above formula.
Therefore the firm should pay $46907.57 for the given project.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "D": product of an extra worker is less than the previous worker's marginal product.
Explanation:
The Law of Diminishing Marginal Productivity indicates that increasing one variable while holding others the same can initially increase output but eventually adding more of that variable results in lower return rates. This law helps explain that it is not always the best way to increase income by increasing production.
<em>Initially, companies recruiting additional workers would boost production until too few machines or not enough space is sufficient to accommodate everyone. Then, the production rate will decrease.</em>
Answer:
increase both aggregate supply and real output.
Explanation:
A rise in productivity makes it possible for each and every firm to rise the greater amount of output. due to this aggregate supply will rise which will lead to increase in the real output.
Also the rise in productivity increase the aggregate supply and the AS curve would be shifted to right that rise the real output but reduce the level of the price in the new equilibrium output level
Therefore the above represent the answer
Answer:
the income elasticity of bread is 20/39 and bread is an inferior good
Answer:
C. sequential games.
Explanation:
Game theory is the learning of analytical types of mediation, ambivalence, and interaction between people, corporations, and governments. In-game theory, a sequential game means any game where an individual contestant picks their move before rest of the performers pick theirs. Importantly, the following performer's necessity has fascinating erudition regarding the first's selection, contrarily, the variation in period would have no strategic effect.
