<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be that Penn created an unprecedented atmosphere of peace and civility in the colonies by welcoming people of all creeds and backgrounds.</span></span>
Answer:This can be to carry out a cape, resist or undo a social change. It is a type of group action and may involve individuals, organizations, or both. The term variables are slightly varied. Social movements have been described as "organizational structures and strategies that can empower oppressed populations to face effective challenges and resist the most powerful and favored elites." Representative of a method of social change from below within nations.
Explanation:
A social movement is a poorly organized effort by a large group of people to achieve a particular goal, usually social or political.
There are more people who are governed than who does the government. Governing with people's liberties is what makes the country thrive along with its economy and the conditions of the civilians livelihood. Additionally, impeding upon your publics rights for the sake of securing a kind of tyrranical rule over people, will always result in an overthrowing by the public.
With the regards to the statement that if not for Americans participating in WWI, Prohibition would not happen, this statement is <u>false</u>.
<h3>Why is this statement false?</h3>
The movement to enact prohibition was already growing strongly before the First World War broke out.
In fact, before the U.S. joined the war, those in support of Prohibition had majorities in the two houses of Congress. WWI was merely an event that sped up the rate of prohibition and without it, Prohibition would have still happened at a later stage.
Find out more on Prohibition at brainly.com/question/3814594.