The correct answer is that it discounts or ignores the contributions of everyone else involved in the creation. It lays the emphasis on the director as the (almost exclusive, or at least the only one who matters) author of a film, which nearly excludes anybody else, especially the screen writers, who even protested and went on strike because of the neglect they experienced.
Answer:
a.The Greenberg interview provides an insider's view of the Brown vs. Board of Education case; the perspective of the informational article is more distant.
Explanation:
<em>Brown vs. Board of Education</em> is a famous case based on a fight against racial segregation of white and nonwhite kids going to separate schools. Supreme Court decided that education in separate schools is unconstitutional.
<em>Greenberg</em> was one of the lawyers that participated in winning this case against Board of Education. His interview included relevant first-hand information about the case and its participants. Informational article on <em>Thurgood Marshall</em> is based on research and on this interview. So option A is correct.
Its not really clear :///////////////////////
Olivia should add WHY she wants a health career in a hospital. She mentions that she 'realized she wanted to specialize in health care administration during a summer internship' - but not WHAT happened to make her feel that way.
When giving an elevator pitch, it's always a good idea to add a relevant story - make them relate / care about you a bit more.