In the case,Texas v.Johnson,the texas court tried and convicted Mr.Johnson for violating the statute that prohibited the desecration of venerated objects e.g the American flag that could arouse anger in other individuals.Johnson appealed with the argument that the actions were a "symbolic speech" protected by the First Amendment.
Texas laws punishes actions such as flag burning that might arouse anger in other but it this case the outrage alone couldnot justify for supressing Johnson's freedom of speech.In this perspective,the Texas law discriminated upon view point in that though it punishes such actions,it still specifically exempt prosecution of actions with similar defination such as burning or burying of worn-out flag.
Therefore, flag burning in Texas v.Johnson constituted a symbolic speech and is protected by the Firts Amendment.
I think it is the president, but <em>I don't know bc I don't see answer choices</em>
Answer:
they both had rulers, they were both way to over power their government, they were both at war, both had powerful government.
Explanation:
<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be a "conservative coalition", sine this was made up of wealthy businessmen, skilled artisans and more who heavily contributed to McKinley's campaign. </span></span>
C. his comparison of moral courage to bravery in battle and intelligence
(Not sure, but I hope this helps)
