Answer:
Aaron's attitude toward the task exemplifies A. the insufficient justification effect.
Explanation:
The insufficient justification effect tries to offer an explanation to why individuals facing cognitive dissonance still deal with the situation causing the dissonance. Cognitive dissonance happens when individuals find themselves in conflict. Maybe they believe in something but are forced to see that belief as incorrect, for instance. That will cause a discomfort - dissonance - that will only go away when the person involved changes something about the situation or their beliefs.
<u>One way to make cognitive dissonance go away is by finding an internal explanation to something when the external explanation is clearly insufficient. That is what Aaron has done. There is no reason for his brother to make more money than he does for doing the same task. Aaron, however, has overcome the discomfort caused by the situation. He might have decided, for example, that he is not doing it for the money, that the task is fun, or that it feels nice to help. He has found an interior justification - the insufficient justification effect.</u>
The big difference is that the French were very kind to the Native Americans, while the Spanish were pretty harsh, forcing them into Christianity. I don't really know any similarities except maybe trading.
Hope this helps!
Answer:
The internet has provide and shape sexual culture.
Explanation:
Shyla and Chris were paired on an online platform based on their compatibility. The internet has helped them to shape sexual culture. The online dating website had questionnaires which were asked to Chris and Shyla and based on those preferences they were paired together. They seem to be satisfied with this pairing as they have been together since three years.
Answer:D. Deductive logic
Explanation:
Deductive reasoning, is based on making a conclusion given one or more statement.
If given all the statements or premises are true then it is easy to draw a conclusion and deductive logic can be applied.
Deductive reasoning is a top down logic kind of reasoning whereas bottom up logic is inductive reasoning this is because when we deduct our reasoning we start from the top of what we are solving until we reach the bottom then we can make a conclusion like when we solve mathematical issues.
Inductive you work with a solution and work your way back on how it was discovered.
