He wanted to get strong enough to take persia
The answer that is not true is A: "Scott could only sue in state courts."
Whether Dred Scott, as a slave, had any legal right to sue in court was a matter that applied whether talking about state or federal courts. When Scott's suit was rejected by a state of Missouri court, Scott and his supporters managed to bring the case into a federal court, and it went all the way to the Supreme Court. Though the Supreme Court at the time ruled that Scott had no right to bring the suit because he was a slave and not a citizen (point D above), the case gave Chief Justice Roger Taney opportunity to make further statements regarding the slavery issue, including points B and C in your list above.
Answer:
As the country dragged into chaos and civil war the British played Indian National Congress and Muslim League off one another. Thus inevitably long term commitment of British to Indian unity was no longer valid.
Explanation
hope this helps
A, theocracy. Few of these exist today, but one example is Iran
Plymouth had more food, skills, and more, while jamestown went into cannibalism and ate each other, not all people in plymouth lived either, plymouth also went into cannibalism, but plymouth was a better place to live.
