Answer:
Risk and Return
1. Joe is an average investor. His financial advisor gave him options of investing in stock A, with a σ of 12%, and stock B, with a σ of 9%. Both stocks have the same expected return of 16%. Joe can pick only one stock and decides to invest in stock B.
Good Financial Decision?
Yes
No
2. Marcie works for an educational technology firm that recently launched its employee stock option plan (ESOP). Marcie allocated all her investments in the ESOP.
Good Financial Decision?
Yes
No
3. rin wants to invest in a hedge fund that has had a very strong performance track record. The hedge fund has given its investors a return of over 60% for the past five years. Although Erin is tempted to put her money in the fund, she decides to conduct due diligence on the hedge fund’s assets, because she is aware that past performance is no guarantee of future results.
Good Financial Decision?
Yes
No
Explanation:
1. Joe's decision to invest in stock B is a good financial decision. Since both investments have the same returns, the decision on which investment to take shifts to the standard deviation of the returns, which specifies the variability of the returns. Invariably, the investment with less standard deviation should win the vote. Therefore, Joe's decision is a good financial decision because investment in B has a standard deviation of 9% unlike A's 12%.
2. Putting all eggs in one market as Marcie had done by allocating all her investments in the ESOP is not a good financial decision, theoretically. It is always best to spread the risks, though higher-yielding investments (returns) bear higher risks.
3. The decision of Erin to conduct due diligence on the hedge fund's assets, despite its past performance is a good financial decision. Due diligence reveals some behind-the-scene information that are instrumental in making sound business decisions. Who are the present managers of the fund? What systems are in place in the entity to guarantee similar future performance, all things being equal? What market's sentiments and information are available for consideration? These questions, and many others can be answered through a due diligence. Surely, "past performance is no guarantee of future results."
Answer:
The correct answer is B: the jobs produced during the period have been under-costed
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
If manufacturing overhead has been under-allocated during the period, then which of the following is true?
(a) the jobs produced during the period have been over-costed
(b) the jobs produced during the period have been under-costed
(c) the jobs produced during the period have been costed correctly
(d) none of the above
When manufacturing overhead has been under-allocated means that the actual costs incurred where superior that the estimated cost for the period.
They should try to take free online school classes
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "B": Establish a sense of urgency by creating a compelling reason for why change is needed.
Explanation:
American educator John Kotter (born in 1947) in his book "<em>Leading Change</em>" (2011) proposed an eight-step method to generate change within an organization. The first of them is to Create Urgency, where potential risks are identified, and scenarios that illustrate what might happen in the future are created. Also, honest discussions are carried out to offer diverse and compelling reasons of why the change is needed.
Answer:
B. the business cycle
Explanation:
Macroeconomics studies how an economy behaves, this means, how the markets work on a large scale by analyzing inflation, economic growth, DCP, etc.
I hope you find this information useful and interesting! Good luck!
