Answer:
b. false
Explanation:
Generally, this statement is incorrect because the company should be viewed as an ongoing company and the use of debt (or equity) to fund a given project will change the capital structure and this factor should determine the cost of capital on all projects on the target capital structure. "Prague Ekt financing "may be used and in particular the status of the project will be considered. It is a very specific situation, however, it" usually "is not.
Answer:
a. unethical
Explanation:
This company's behavior is unethical. In the globalized world, it is natural for transnational firms to direct their production structure to countries where labor is cheaper, as this makes their product more competitive in the international market. However, these firms must not take advantage of regulatory failures in the labor market in these countries to increase their profit. Every firm must be concerned and ensure that the physical integrity and health of employees who work on its plants is preserved, regardless of location. Thus, in order to act ethically, this firm should implement process improvements to minimize the exposure of employees to chemical agents and to inhibit the exploitation of the labor that occurs when employees work in excess and without being paid for overtime.
Answer:
None
Explanation:
Dear friend,
Kindly input the complete question not just the options.
Thanks
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Remember, that the term 'company strength' is commonly used to refer to the overall advantages a company has.
Thus, when it was said that Channel has the ability to appeal to different niche audiences that they can guarantee a "16 to 34 year old ABC1 audience at peak viewing times.
Also, mention was made about the company receiving 17 Oscar nominations in the year 1994. All this facts highlights the company's strength.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "A": to appeal to both high and low involvement consumers.
Explanation:
Strong arguments are those that provide probable support for an idea. Weak arguments fail to provide support for different matters. Then, when talking about marketing, strong arguments are more likely to engage consumers with a product while weak arguments can attract consumers at low levels but the ideas lack reliability.
Thus,<em> infomercials can make use of both strong and weak arguments at different levels of consumer involvement.</em>
