Frances must stand by his ethical standards and defer his plans to market the product.
Explanation:
Frances is stranded amidst classic case of an ethical dilemma. The ethical dilemma is an ethical perspective which puts a person in a state of to do or not. This is common and everyone undergoes through this phase for more than once in his/her lifetime.
The dilemma arises due to the substantiative profits that he can earn from marketing the product and his ethical concerns that the product is harmful for a section of the user. He needs to stick to his ethical standards and put the products to more rigorous tests and research. This would enable him to market his products in the future with some twitches and upholding his ethical concerns too.
Yes I would sacrifice potentially winning the state title. Using performance enhancing drugs is both morally wrong, and illegal. If my team was to win states I would want it to be because we deserved it, not because players were taking drugs. Not only that, but the players who took the drugs could be causing a lot of harm to their bodies, something that isn't worth a title.
The overhead cost that should be allocated to Zeta via activity-based costing is $356,000.
The following formula for determining the overhead cost allocated to Zeta:
= Zeta pool no 1 ÷ total pool no 1 × pool cost + zeta pool no 2 ÷ total pool no 2 × pool cost + zeta pool no 3 ÷ total pool no 3 × pool cost
= 2,800 ÷ 4,000 × $160,000 + 55 ÷ 100 × $280,000 + 750 ÷ 3,000 x $360,000
= $356,000
Therefore we can conclude that the overhead cost that should be allocated to Zeta via activity-based costing is $356,000.
Learn more about the overhead here: brainly.com/question/11950737
Answer:
workplace in New York City and delivered a summons to appear in court in Maryland. The lawsuit against her relates to property damage that occurred in a home sh rented in New Jersey, which
Answer:
A
- M1 change = $500
- M2 change = $0
B
- M1 change = -$340
- M2 change = -$180
Explanation:
A. M1 includes actual liquid cash in hand as well as cash in checking deposits.
M2 includes M1 as well as savings deposits and time deposits amongst others.
M1 change = +$500
$500 went from the Savings account which was not part of M1 to M1.
M2 change = $0
The money went from Savings to Checking which are both part of M2.
B.
M1 change = -$-180 - ( 500 - 180 -160 ) = -$340
Tax of $180 went out of the supply as tax. Jane deposits the remaining cash after paying $160 for goods into the savings account which is not part of M1. That remaining cash is = 500 - 180 - 160 = $160.
M2 change = -500 + 160 + 160 = -$180
For M2, only taxes will reduce money from it because the rest goes to checking deposits and savings accounts both of which are part of M2
