Whitman uses rhyming couplets, but he intentionally breaks the flow and pattern of the couplets in the last four lines of each s
tanza. Notice, too, that rhymes are sometimes perfect (ex: "done" and "won"), but other times the rhymes are slant or near (ex: "bells" and "trills"). Why, do you suppose, Whitman decided to subtly break the traditional pattern?
Please find the complete question in the attached file.
It underlines its broken psyche of the mariner as well as the country. Unless the poem was great rhyming couples, it's feeling of the kid would gain traction. This poem is a kind of poetry, including Dr. Seuss. It also helps people feel, that through destroying the framework everyone was wrong or "off." The ordinary lifestyle was disrupted, that's what happened in 1865 to a nation. The organization stresses, which is the concept of Whitman.
