Answer:
Agency conflicts between managers and shareholders
1. A New Beginning (ANB)
A. Yes; Alexander is misappropriating some of Akiko's wealth by unilaterally purchasing a nonbusiness asset using ANB's funds.
2. The Green Zone Inc. (TGZ):
B. No; although an agency relationship exists between TGZ's management-including Tae as TGZ's chairman and CEO and the firm's shareholders-there is no agency conflict, because no expropriation or wasting of the shareholders' wealth has occurred.
3. In the best interest of shareholders, compensation packages should be structured in a way such that managers have an incentive to maximize the__LONG-TERM____value of the company's common stock price.
4. In addition to well-designed executive compensation packages, two other motivational forces can align the interests of managers with those of their shareholders.
a. Reward the manager with a combination of salary and stock options
b. Let the manager to understand that a takeover can happen if she does not perform well.
5. In the late 1980s and early 1990s, Congress passed legislation making it more difficult for outside investors to stage hostile takeovers. This legislation likely__increases____conflicts between managers and stockholders.
Explanation:
Agency conflicts of interest exist in any relationship where one party is expected to act in another's best interests. Agency problems or conflicts of interest usually exist between a company's management and the company's stockholders. But, it can equally exist in a relationship where one party acts against the interest of the other.
Answer:B) $28,980.
Explanation:
Beginning inventory is 6,000 ounces
Closing inventory = 8,200 × 3 ounces × 25% = 6,150ounces
Budgeted production = 8,000 × 3 ounces=24,000
Direct material to be purchased = Closing inventory + Budgeted production - Beginning inventory= 29,400 ounces
Direct material to be purchased = 6,150ounces +24,000- 6,000 ounces
= 24,150 ounces
Now,For $1.20 per pounce, it would be
= 24,150 ounces × $1.20
= $28,980.
In general? Deductions is to take away. So tax deductions would mean it can be taken away from the amount.
Answer: The equilibrium price is most likely to "DECREASE BY $1". Option c is the most correct option.
Explanation: A unit tax of $1 is the tax on the sales of the unit. In a supply demand curve, an increase in the sales tax will cause the curve to shift inwardly, thereby showing a decrease in the equilibrium price of the curve.
Equilibrium price is the point where the amount suppllied is equal to the consumers demand at a stable price.
For $1 unit tax to be levied on the goods, it will increase the price of the goods by $1, which will reduce supply by $1, therefore the equilibrium price will decrease by $1 to adjust itself on the new changes.
