Explanation:
I know right!! its annoyinggg
The answer I believe is D) The loss of healthy young men during World Wars I and II created an excess of healthy, marriageable young women.
The Boston Port Act, the first of the laws passed in 1774 in response to the Boston Tea Party, closed the port of Boston until the colonists paid for the destroyed tea and until the king was satisfied that order had been restored. Colonists objected that the Port Act punished all of Boston rather than just the individuals who had destroyed the tea and that they were being punished without having been given an opportunity to testify in their own defense.
The Massachusetts Government Act provoked, even more, outrage than the Port Act because it unilaterally took away Massachusetts' charter and brought it under control of the British government. Under the terms of the Government Act, almost all positions in the colonial government were to be appointed by the governor, Parliament, or king. The act also severely limited the activities of town meetings in Massachusetts to one meeting a year, unless the Governor called for one. Colonists outside Massachusetts feared that their governments could now also be changed by the legislative fiat of Parliament.
The Administration of Justice Act allowed the Royal governor to order that trials of accused royal officials take place in Great Britain or elsewhere within the Empire if he decided that the defendant could not get a fair trial in Massachusetts. Although the act stipulated for witnesses to be reimbursed after having traveled at their own expense across the Atlantic, it was not stipulated that this would include reimbursement for lost earnings during the period for which they would be unable to work, leaving few with the ability to testify. George Washington called this the "Murder Act" because he believed that it allowed British officials to harass Americans and then escape justice. Many colonists believed the act was unnecessary because British soldiers had been given a fair trial following the Boston Massacre in 1770.
Answer:
the bystander effect.
Explanation:
According to the bystander effect one is less likely to help a person when there number of people in the vicinity is high.
The reasons why this happens is due to three factors, diffusion of responsibility, ambiguity and behaving according to social norms.
- Diffusion of responsibility
When there are a lot of people around one might think that someone else will take the responsibility of taking action. This may happen as one might think that someone else might be better suited to handle the situation
If the situation is not clearly understood by the bystander then they will be less likely to help.
One might think if they would help it would be going against the social norms and hence hesitate to do so.
Here, Mr. Hughes has decided not to help because of the diffusion of responsibility.
Hence, his reaction illustrates the bystander effect.
False, the purpose of international trade is to import AND export
