1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
maxonik [38]
3 years ago
6

Describe events that explain the border differences between these maps. Use information from the maps and the lesson in your res

ponse. Use complete sentences. Besides land, what did the United States gain from expansion? Use information from the maps and the lesson in your response. Use complete sentences.
History
2 answers:
Greeley [361]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

1.     Describe events that explain the border differences between these maps. Use information from the maps and the lesson in your response. Use complete sentences.

The border differences shown on the maps are the number of resources the different area have. For instance, the Oregon Territory area does not have a ton of resources, there is only some gold and little coal, but the Mexican Cession area has a lot more of a supply, including lots of gold, and some oil and coal. Those are some differences between the two regions.

2.     Besides land, what did the United States gain from expansion? Use information from the maps and the lesson in your response. Use complete sentences.

In the expansion the United States received a lot of resources. They now have lots of gold, oil, and coal, and that is along with the land.  

 

Step Two: Answer the question below using the framework provided.

 

Develop your own point of view on whether the US should have expanded its borders.  Use information from the lesson and the maps to explain your opinion.  Give at least two reasons for your point of view and answer the following in complete sentences.

 

3.  Should the United States have declared war on Mexico?  I think the US should/should not have….

  Why?  First, I believe that ….  Second, I hold the view that ….

I think the US should not have declared war on Mexico. First, I believe that it is unnecessary bloodshed and violence. Second, I hold the view that we would be risking our soldiers’ lives for something we do not absolutely need.  

Step 3:  Form a counterargument and rebuttal to your opinion of whether we should have declared war on Mexico.

4.   Write you counterargument and rebuttal here:  While some may argue that …. I disagree because …

While some may argue that we would have gained another state (Texas), I disagree because we already had enough land and supplies at that time.

Explanation:

arsen [322]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

From the Westward expansion that the United States completed during the 19th century, the U.S. gained a lot of important things. From fulfilling the idea of Manifest Destiny, to acquiring more than two million square kilometers full of unexplored territory and untapped wealth.

The U.S. also gained much needed new land for its growing population to settle, especially since during the latter half of the nineteenth century, immigration to the U.S. exploded like never before in history.

You might be interested in
After independence, who represented Georgia in Congress?
N76 [4]
George Walton I'm pretty sure.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Read the following excerpt from the epic of gilgamesh. which phrase shows that gilgamesh ruled over a theocracy?
sergey [27]

Correct answer:

D. "Two thirds they made him god and one third man"

A <u>theocracy</u> is rule by God or the gods.  In telling the origins of Gligamesh, it is said that he was created by and sent by the gods to rule.  Indeed, the gods made him two-thirds god to carry out divine rule among men.

The Epic of Gilgamesh comes from ancient Mesopotamia, dating back to around 2100 BC.  It is one of the oldest surviving examples of ancient literature, a compilation of poems telling the story of Gilgamesh,  king of the Mesopotamian city-state Uruk.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The evacuation was necessary because
hjlf
I believe it is answer A good luck!
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Tinker v. Des Moines Supreme court case connected two students who wore black armbands to school to protest the Vietnam war.
allochka39001 [22]

Hugo Black's dissenting opinion basically provided for more latitude if there was disruption. So, A. There is precedent for schools limiting the rights of students when they anticipate a disruption

6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did President Hoover refuse demands for the federal government to provide direct payments to the unemployed and needy?
KATRIN_1 [288]

Answer:

C

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Prompt
    8·2 answers
  • In which continent would we likely find Stone Age people wearing fur coats?
    11·1 answer
  • In what types of unethical and illegal activities did the White House plumbers and the “dirty tricks” squad engage?
    14·1 answer
  • read the following summary on the Baker V Carr case. Explain how political divisions are created and how this case affected poli
    15·1 answer
  • The study of economics focuses on identifying which of the following?
    7·1 answer
  • How did the US. Constitution solve a problem created by the Articles of the Confederation
    13·2 answers
  • 4.- ¿Qué es lo más importante de lo que creemos?
    7·1 answer
  • Which best describes the overall results of the
    14·1 answer
  • Where are y'all from?​
    9·2 answers
  • The Supreme Court case found the right for abortion in a person's right to privacy under the protection byof the constitution. P
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!