1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
babunello [35]
3 years ago
6

Please please help it's due in one hour I'm not lying! please don't copy&paste from the internet!! and don't use me for poin

ts!!!
For this activity, you will write one paragraph explaining whether you think the sharecropping system was a success or a failure. You must use evidence to support your reasoning. Be sure to use complete sentences with proper grammar, spelling, and punctuation.
History
1 answer:
vlada-n [284]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

firstly you have to define what the sharecropping system was and when it came by which was in the year 1870, I don't know much about it but talk about how it was unfair to the people renting the land as not only did they have to rent the plot of land which they would work themselves but also have to give a portion of their crop to the landowner, probably giving more than he has. I don't know if this helped but

You might be interested in
How do all of rights and responsibilities of US citizens reflect who we are as a country?
liberstina [14]

The rights and responsibilites of US reflect our values as a country. In the United States, citizens have several different important liberties including (but not limited to):

- freedom of speech

-freedom of religion

-right to petition

-right to protest peacefully

-ability to have a trial in front of an impartial jury

- right to vote

These rights show that America is a country that is focused on providing significant freedom and choice for its citizens. As Americans, we have the ability to vote for whatever political candidate we want, practice the religion of our choice, and speak out against laws on the local, state, or national level. All of these freedoms ensure that America is a country with diverse thoughts and allows for differences in opinion among citizens.

8 0
3 years ago
What similarities and differences can you note between martin's experience and description of the battle from account given by t
denis23 [38]

The similarities and differences can you note between martin's experience and description of the battle from the account given by the hessian soldier was that they surprised the British in a siege that turned the tide toward an American victory in the War for Independence.

The Siege of Yorktown proved to be a central part of the American Revolutionary War. The British surrender predicted the end of British rule in the colonies and the birth of a new country, the United States. American victory. During the three-week siege they caused great casualties, British troops surrendered more than more by the Continental Army and its French allies. This last major land battle of the American Revolutionary War led to peace talks with Britain and the signing of the 1783 Treaty of Paris.

Situation After the 6 years of war, both British and Continental troops were exhausted. British troops had little American coastal territory on enemy territory. Beyond the Atlantic Ocean, Britain also wages a world war between France and Spain.

The Siege of Yorktown proved to be a central part of the American Revolutionary War. The British surrender predicted the end of British rule in the colonies and the birth of a new country, the United States.

Learn more about the Battle of Yorktown here: brainly.com/question/2114485

#SPJ4

3 0
1 year ago
Internal Factors in the fall of the Ottoman empire
Lapatulllka [165]

The Ottoman economy was disrupted by inflation, caused by the influx of precious metals into Europe from the Americas and by an increasing imbalance of trade between East and West.

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What did the Mongols avoid doing because they claimed it would anger the gods? shaving their heads wearing silk garments washing
Alona [7]
They avoided washing their clothes because they were afraid of the gods punishment...gross, huh?

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Grant’s policy to win the war was one of <br> what
makvit [3.9K]

Answer:

Grant's policy to win the war was one of <em>attrition</em>.

Attrition is a gradual reduction in work force without firing personnel, as when workers resign or retire and are not replaced. Or in other words, it is a reduction or decrease in numbers, size, or strength (can be used in <em>"ACW"</em> terms)

<h2>What was General Ulysses S. Grant's strategy to win the war? (American Civil War)</h2>

It's critical to keep in mind that Grant wasn't solely responsible for the overall plan he employed during the war's final year. Lincoln urged that Confederate forces be struck and that Confederate cities and logistics be disregarded in favor of striking the enemy where he was, as described in James McPherson's book Tried by War. Lincoln's insistence on this at the expense of actions that would have had a larger immediate impact on the Confederate ability to prolong the war contributed in part to the "butcher" label placed on Grant. Grant would have sent half of the Army of the Potomac below the James River in order to push on Petersburg in May 1864, which would have certainly resulted in a shorter conflict and far fewer losses. Grant had the most crystal-clear vision of everyone as to how the Union could and should win the war: deny the Confederacy the resources necessary for it to wage war. Making the Anaconda Plan work first and foremost means seizing control of all significant Confederate harbors in order to prevent the supply of weapons and equipment from Europe. (In his narrative, he frequently laments how he was unable to carry out the attack on Mobile that he had planned, first because to Banks' Red River campaign and subsequently as a result of the sluggish and uncooperative generals on the ground.)

As a department commander in the Mississippi Valley, Grant's largest grievance, incidentally, was with licensed trade that occurred between the Union and Confederacy. Lincoln's government actually let traders to cross the lines and buy cotton using gold coin, which the Confederates would employ to transport drugs and other contraband from the Union. This was because the North was in such dire need of raw cotton. Grant thought that the commerce had bolstered the rebellion while weakening Union war resolve by fostering corruption. (And he felt a great deal of personal humiliation about the whole situation because his own father was heavily involved in the cross-border commerce.) Grant supported stealing or destroying indigenous Southern industries in addition to blocking Confederate trade overseas. As a result, the main Confederate cities—New Orleans, Richmond, Nashville, and Charleston—were captured and held while lesser towns were destroyed. This naturally included agriculture, which is why he specifically instructed Sheridan to remove all livestock from the Shenandoah and why he authorized Sherman's march into Georgia. Finally, Grant thought that steady pressure from all Union troops acting together would be the best way to achieve this on all fronts. By 1863, Grant realized that the Confederacy's greatest strength was their ability to shift troops from one dangerous location to another because Union forces kept starting and stopping without applying constant pressure to the enemy. Grant was well aware of the manpower and logistical limitations of the Confederacy. He thought that by applying continued pressure to the rebel troops, they would be forced to retreat or capitulate in the face of considerably superior forces. Grant's initiatives, as we all know, had a mixed record of success and were not completely implemented. Lincoln and Stanton (especially Stanton) interfered quite a bit. Grant's feeling of urgency for quick action was not shared by the majority of other Union generals, allowing the Confederacy to continue temporarily moving forces to fulfill demands. However, when massive casualty lists failed to do so, it was the conquest of Confederate ports, the obliteration of Confederate industry and agriculture, and the ensuing collapse of the southern economy that eventually shattered the rebel will to fight. In that regard, Grant's plan was the best one—and it worked.

Learn more about Ulysses Grant:

brainly.com/question/21942516

brainly.com/question/12468430

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • the united states has the most aggressive programs in place to reduce carbon emissions of any other countries true or false ?
    13·1 answer
  • What is Frustration often causes
    11·1 answer
  • How did the constitution overcome the weakness of the articles of confederation
    9·2 answers
  • Which part of Texas's economy experienced a boom during the 1930's?
    5·1 answer
  • Why were immigrants turned into suspects in WW1?
    13·2 answers
  • Blizzards and hurricanes are examples of contrasting observable events T or F
    5·1 answer
  • Why did Texans divert rivers and streams?
    8·1 answer
  • HELP! What effect(s) did the closed-country policy have on Japan?
    7·2 answers
  • The map shows trade along the Silk Road.
    9·2 answers
  • Why do most people in Latin America practice Christianity?
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!