All categories

3 years ago

Which was not a part of Lyndon Johnson’s Great Society educational reforms?

History

2 answers:

muminat3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

I think the 3rd one

Explanation:

I’m not sure so don’t quote me

Slav-nsk [51]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

establishment of the U.S. Department of Education

Explanation:

You might be interested in

Which is a component of the modern Democratic Party’s platform?

nekit [7.7K]

Extending the role of government into industries that have been traditionally private, like healthcare.

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Where did England's tenants go after landowners began raising sheep?

andre [41]

Answer:

In the first phase, clearance resulted from agricultural improvement, driven by the need for landlords to increase their income (many landlords had crippling debts, with bankruptcy playing a large part in the history). This involved the enclosure of the open fields managed on the run rig system and the shared grazing. Especially in the North and West of the region, these were usually replaced with large-scale pastoral farms stocked with sheep, on which much higher rents were paid, with the displaced tenants getting alternative tenancies in newly created crofting communities, where they were expected to be employed in industries such as fishing, quarrying or the kelp industry. The reduction in status from farmer to crofter was one of the causes of resentment from these changes.

Explanation:

he eviction of tenants went against dùthchas, the principle that clan members had an inalienable right to rent land in the clan territory. This was never recognised in Scottish law. It was gradually abandoned by clan chiefs as they began to think of themselves simply as commercial landlords, rather than as patriarchs of their people—a process that arguably started with the Statutes of Iona of 1609. The clan members continued to rely on dùthchas. This different viewpoint was an inevitable source of grievance.35–36, 39, 60, 300 The actions of landlords varied. Some did try to delay or limit evictions, often to their financial cost. The Countess of Sutherland genuinely believed her plans were advantageous for those resettled in crofting communities and could not understand why tenants complained. A few landlords displayed complete lack of concern for evicted tenants.

7 0

3 years ago

Your task is to write a fictional newspaper story assuming that the Declaration of Independence was never written. Assume that t

slava [35]

Answer:

The complaints chosen were: Not able to trade freely and Unfair taxes.

Explanation:

Open letter to readers

Our country is hundreds of years old, our territory is rich, rich, productive and efficient. Our people are honest, hardworking and ready to take care of their own destiny, their own business and their own prosperity. Amidst all these admirable qualities I wonder: how long will we be subjected to the British abuses that prevent our nation from moving forward.

We are a captive people, as we have no control over our own resources, which have been exploited dishonestly by the British for years. First of all, we must stress that England forbids us to freely negotiate our products, produced and built, planted and harvested by us. This keeps us at the mercy of the English trade, which believes that it has the right to price our work in a way that reduces us and leaves us dependent on England.

We are not a dependent people and we have to reaffirm our supremacy over our products and our autonomy to do business as we see fit.

Not satisfied, England decided to enrich our costs by charging abusive and totally unjust taxes, which are not transformed into services for us but for them. As a result, england is increasingly educated and structured, while we do not have the financial resources to improve education, transportation, communication and countless socioeconomic issues in our country.

This makes me ask you, readers: How long will we accept this type of administration? Will we have to wait thousands of years? Haven't we already been harmed enough by this petty nation? Shouldn't we fight for our defense?

3 0

3 years ago

Write two paragraphs that provide two different claims that support your central thesis. Try to include a topic sentence, data,

Anettt [7]

Answer:

The 13th Amendment, ratified in 1865, formally abolished slavery in the territory of the United States. Through this amendment to the constitutional text, slavery was prohibited, thus protecting the rights of African Americans, who until then were subject to said slave and segregationist regime in the southern states of the country.

Although this amendment did not solve all the problems of black people in the country, it was a milestone in the development of civil rights for this social group, which advanced more quickly in the north of the country, while the southern states they applied segregationist policies after the end of Reconstruction.

Thus, finally, after the enactment of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, African-Americans had access to the same rights as whites in the nation, applying this amendment in its entirety.

8 0

3 years ago

Can someone please help me

pickupchik [31]

D, the boston massacre

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers