The music: The music danced happily around me.
The ocean waves: The ocean waves tickled my feet.
Trash: The trash flew in the garbage.
Birds: The birds sang to me.
Heart: My heart was beating out of my chest.
Math: Math equations were swirling around in my head.
Hands: My hands tell a story.
Homework: not sure
Sports: not sure
Answer:
It really depends. If the student that is peer reviewing is diligent in doing the task he/she is given, it may improve peoples writing style. Reviews of drafts may also help students in being able to critique others as well as give feedback, while building a relationship with the writer.
However, if the peer reviewer does not do a good job, then it would not help improve their writings.
A good review generally consists of at least one or more positive feedback, critique on any problems, some opinions on how to fix some issues, of course the basics such as spelling & grammar check, but the whole of the peer review is to give some other view, and trying to mold the essay into something better.
~
Answer:
The answer is B. To ensure the logical flow of ideas
Explanation:
I just took the test.
Answer:
C. One protects other.
Explanation:
First, you should eliminate what isn't reasonable.
D says "both are used in urban environments" this answer choice doesn't seem that reliable, and it doesn't relate AT ALL to the analogy, because castles and helmets aren't even of modern time, and more medieval times.
B. says "one purchases the other" this doesn't make any sense, because a castle doesn't buy a moat, and a head doesn't buy a helmet, though you can buy them, they don't buy each other.
Now you are left with A and C
A says covers the other, while C says protects the other. If you do not know, a moat of a castle is actually the bridge in front of a castle that can be considered the passage of entry and the exit as well. This can be considered as a form of protection to keep out any enemies. So, the actual answer is C.
