Answer:
The correct answer is 1) The bank favored a few elite people and violated the "equality" among citizens, making the bank unconstitutional.
Explanation:
President Andrew Jackson, born in North Carolina, obtained the title of lawyer, and participated several times in the Senate, also became the seventh president of the United States, interested in providing equal opportunities to citizens during his tenure.
After the first bank in the United States ends its period, President Andrew Jackson took a definitive position of the second bank in the United States; he believed that this second bank helped a small part of the population, forgetting about the other citizens of the country.
President Jackson believed that the second bank was a monopoly and only favored the upper class of the country and promised citizens to close it. The president after winning the elections in 1833, managed to censor the second bank of the United States and distribute the funds in state banks to help citizens.
<em>I hope this information can help you.</em>
Answer:
I am truly sorry fellow lady but it seems to me that this excruciating pain in my head has me hurt from the voice and strange noise coming from out of your trap and it seems to me that you are very loquacious and i hear about you all of the time malady sleeping with other people and it has me at heart. I can assure you that there is someone waiting... being patient out there waiting to find the love that you are here in front of my eyes and they are sightless. My beloved has me already at full heart and i cannot replace mine with someone else's who shall i say is a prostitute. You are very young madam who has the courage for money and not heart. So please let someone else pay your adepts you greedy women
Explanation:This was a very nice man from England and who already has a wife of his own. Your welcome :]
Some were willing to give up their land while others were not.
Answer:
https://www.history.com/topics/world-war-ii/american-response-to-the-holocaust
Explanation:
Conflicts of interest can arise during the peer review process since the selection of reviewers for a project that could be published could reveal the peer reviewer's bias about the study's field of study could exist.
<h3>What happens during a peer review?</h3>
The process of evaluating a manuscript's quality before to publication is known as peer review. Independent researchers with expertise in the field review submitted manuscripts for importance, validity, and originality to assist editors in deciding whether to publish the manuscript in their journal.
<h3>Why is the process of peer review important?</h3>
Due to the fact that peer review effectively exposes an author's work to the examination of other subject-matter experts, it has become the cornerstone of the scholarly publication system. As a result, it motivates authors to generate top-notch research that will improve the discipline.
Learn more about peer review process: brainly.com/question/13201488
#SPJ4
