1. The western technology aided among other social and political factors in the conquest and control of Asian and African peoples, facilitating the domination against this groups using more advanced weapons. For example, The african forces used weapons such as swords, arrows or old guns while the European colonist used more modern artillery.
2. The National Assembly was a national constituent formed by revolutionary people during the French Revolution in May, 1789. It was known The Third State while the first state was a group of nobles and The Second State was the clergy. The National Assembly spoke against class privilege. For instance, the first and Second state did not pay taxes while the people from the third state were paying it. Consequently, They fought against this inequality and ended up with Feudalism.
3. The first Industrial revolution had on effects on the growth of industries with the use of energy taken from coat for mainly manufacturing textile. The optimization of minerals such as iron for industries was important, too. On the other hand The second Industrial Revolutions had an impact on communication and the spread of information with the invention of the telegraph, the telephone and the invention of the bulb of light patented by Thomas Edison in 1878.
A I think I’m not sure tho!!!! Sorry if I’m not sure and if not A then D I guess sorry
The Speaker Is The Leader Of The House
The <span>Navajo </span>believe that a person who has died is in the underworld.
Answer:
<h3>Yes, society as Kurt Vonnegut imagines in his "Harrison Bergeron" could be read as symbolic of realities in our society today.</h3>
Explanation:
Vonnegut's story presents a future where the U.S Constitution has created a complete uniform society where every citizen is treated equally in every aspects of life. However, to achieve this feat, the government has abolished the principles of individuality and personal liberty.The government subdues any form of individual talent or intellectual abilities.
Vonnegut does not seem to distinguish any particular government here, but we can relate a similar case given the time when he has written this story. The story was published in 1961 which was during the time of Cold War. Perhaps through this story, he wanted to criticize the socialist or Marxian form of government emphasized by USSR.
The story revolves a government that tries to subdue any form of individualistic ideas or innovations. It contrast the tenets of capitalism and democracy where individual freedom and talented intellectuals are oppressed by the government.
Similarly, the control of media and oppression of freedom of speech and expression by governments are some symbolic realities in our society today. This is because the government tries to suppress any form of dissent or criticism against them. Individuals who opposes the government are usually forced into silence by imprisonment and other forms of threats.
