All categories

3 years ago

PLEASE HELP, TIME SENSITIVE

Mathematics

1 answer:

SVEN [57.7K]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

644.67 in^2 remaining

Step-by-step explanation:

So first find the area of this rectangle

rectangle area formula= A=LW

35*26=910

Now we have to find the semi circle value

so we know the diameter is 26 becuase the 2 sides (26 in) are equal and if you fill in the circle the diameter is still 26

A circle formula is

A= π*radius^2

So to find radius divide the diameter by 2

26/2=13

now 13^2=169

Now 169 *3.14 since asked that pi is 3.14

169*3.14=530.66

But Thats the whole circle

The circle that seems to be cut off is half of the original Circle so we half the original circle

530.66/2=265.33

Now we subtract that from the original

910-265.33=644.67

644.67 In^2

You might be interested in

What is the directrix of the parabola with the following equation?<br> (y - 1)2 = -4(x - 1)

Softa [21]

Answer:

x = 2

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

Which expression gives the measure of

AnnyKZ [126]

What??????????????? lol.

3 0

4 years ago

Whats the most accurate estimation of 65 77

Gwar [14]

Addition: 70 + 80 = 150. You round 65 up because the ones digit is greater than and the same with 77.
Multiplication: Round up since both ones digits are bigger than 5. 70 x 80= 5600.

5 0

4 years ago

The function f(x) = −(x + 5)(x + 1) is shown. What is the range of the function? all real numbers less than or equal to 4 all re

Tpy6a [65]

all real numbers such that y is less than or equal to 4

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Calculus piecewise function.

Kipish [7]

Part A

The notation $\lim_{x \to 2^{+}}f(x)$ means that we're approaching x = 2 from the right hand side (aka positive side). This is known as a right hand limit.

So we could start at say x = 2.5 and get closer to 2 by getting to x = 2.4 then to x = 2.3 then 2.2, 2.1, 2.01, 2.001, etc

We don't actually arrive at x = 2 itself. We simply move closer and closer.

Since we're on the positive or right hand side of 2, this means we go with the rule involving x > 2

Therefore f(x) = (x/2) + 1

Plug in x = 2 to find that...

f(x) = (x/2) + 1

f(2) = (2/2) + 1

f(2) = 2

This shows $\lim_{x \to 2^{+}}f(x) = 2$

Then for the left hand limit $\lim_{x \to 2^{-}}f(x)$ , we'll involve x < 2 and we go for the first piece. So,

f(x) = 3-x

f(2) = 3-2

f(2) = 1

Therefore, $\lim_{x \to 2^{-}}f(x) = 1$

===============================================================

Part B

Because $\lim_{x \to 2^{+}}f(x) \ne \lim_{x \to 2^{-}}f(x)$ this means that the limit $\lim_{x \to 2}f(x)$ does not exist.

If you are a visual learner, check out the graph below of the piecewise function. Notice the gap or disconnect at x = 2. This can be thought of as two roads that are disconnected. There's no way for a car to go from one road to the other. Because of this disconnect, the limit doesn't exist at x = 2.

===============================================================

Part C

You'll follow the same type of steps shown in part A.

However, keep in mind that x = 4 is above x = 2, so we'll deal with x > 2 only.

So you'd only involve the second piece f(x) = (x/2) + 1

You should find that f(4) = 3, and that both left and right hand limits equal this value. The left and right hand limits approach the same y value. The limit does exist here. There are no gaps to worry about when x = 4.

===============================================================

Part D

As mentioned earlier, since $\lim_{x \to 4^{+}}f(x) = \lim_{x \to 4^{-}}f(x) = 3$ , this means the limit $\lim_{x \to 4}f(x)$ does exist and it's equal to 3.

As x gets closer and closer to 4, the y values are approaching 3. This applies to both directions.

4 0

2 years ago