Answer:
a) Marginal cost of waiting is greater than the marginal benefit of being served
Explanation:
For an economic perspective, customer leave a fast food restaurant as they find the marginal cost of waiting is higher than the cost of marginal benefit of being served at restaurant.
Marginal cost: In economics, it is a cost that is incurred for an additional unit of benefit received out of certain action or activity.
Marginal benefit: It is a benefit received for an additional unit of cost incurred during the activity taken place.
Therefore, customer have done analysis on the benefit of waiting in a queue for getting served at restaurant, which he found that marginal cost is greater than the marginal benefit of being served.
Answer:
7 years (to the nearest year)
Explanation:
Given that;
A = amount
P= principal
t = time
r = rate
A =3P(given in the question)
Formula for compound interest;
A = P(1 + r)^t
Substituting values;
3P = P(1 + 18/100)^t
3P/P= (1.18)^t
3 = (1.18)^t
log 3 = t log 1.18
t = log 3/log 1.18
t = 0.4771/0.0719
t = 6.6 years
t = 7 years (to the nearest year)
Call them and tell them to not do it, if they don't listen, call the police...simple...
Answer:
b wages, interest payments, rent, and profits
Explanation:
The GDP refers to the Gross domestic product which reflects the finalized market value of the goods and services that are to be produced within the country
Plus According to the factor payments, the GDP are to be calculated based on wages, interest payments, rents, and profits and the same is to be considered while calculating the GDP
Answer: D. The neighbor, because obtaining financing was a condition precedent.
Explanation:
Even though it wasn't listed in the written contract, there was the condition precedent that the contract would not be binding unless funding was obtained. Condition precedent is a condition that must happen for a contract to become enforceable.
Funding was not obtained so the contract cannot be enforced. The neighbor would therefore prevail so long as the owner admits that there was indeed a condition precedent.
