1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
fiasKO [112]
3 years ago
5

Why might the Allies have allowed the Soviet Union to join them when they knew full well about Stalin's tactics

History
1 answer:
SIZIF [17.4K]3 years ago
3 0

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although there are no options attached, we can say the following.

Allies allowed the Soviet Union to join them when they knew full well about Stalin's tactics because Great Britain and France really knew that they alone, could not stop Hitler's troops from invading France and then the British territory.

Winston Churchill and Charles De Gaulle knew that although Joseph Stalin was a tyrant and a dictator, he ruled over a great land with supplies and had the kind of strong men in its army that could be of great help to contain the Germans.

That is how, the three allies with the help of the United States army, could devise a plan to retake North Africa to invade through Italy (the Axis troops had occupied North Africa), invade France from Britain and Germany from the Soviet Union. Once done that, the United States Navy with the help of the Allies could attack and defeat Japan in the Pacific.

You might be interested in
Your view on the british after you witnessed the amristar massacre?
astraxan [27]

Amritsar is also called the JallianWala Bagh massacre. it is one of the most gruesome killing if the common civilians who assembled and were on peaceful strike in Amritsar.

Explanation:

Though Indians supported the British in their wars against Germany and Ottoman empire, The British Raj lacked trust on some of the radical Indians who understood the real purpose of the Britishers to occupy India. Gradually British decided to repress Indians by passing Rowlatt act which authorized the Britishers to imprison the revolutionaries just based on suspicion and the press were also not given the rights and freedom of speech and expression. General Dyer also restricted any association of more than four members in the public places in Amritsar.

But more than twenty thousand civilians assembled in the public park called JallianWala Bagh. General dyer ordered the cease fire and more than four hundred people were killed. This made the Indians to lose hope on the British Government and from thereon the nationalism spirit of Indians rose to such an extent that Independence was indispensable for Indians.

7 0
3 years ago
What was Germany's role at the versailles conference
8090 [49]
Germany had no say the the conference. It was a treaty conference that basically punished them (Germany) after WW1
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Do you think machiavelli was right when he said that a ruler must do whatever is necessary to maintain power
Pavlova-9 [17]
Its a free choice answer.
machiavelli only said that because he believed that if people feared him hed be more powerful ,than if people loved him
3 0
3 years ago
What economic advantage did the North have over the South in the early 1800s?
Aleksandr [31]

Answer:

D) Northern industries, such as manufacturing and shipping, benefited from the cheap southern materials and exporting their own goods.

Explanation:

Since the early colonial period the north created mainly a manufacturing economy.  This had to do with the natural resources they had available, but also the weather conditions in the area.  The cold temperatures made large-scale plantations impossible.  The north had an abundance of timber and began to exploit the resource.  They also established important ports for sea trade which continued to be used during the 1800s and beyond.  Eventually they created an industrialized economy that manufactured goods based on raw materials from the south, and exported the finished products to the rest of the country and even Europe.

6 0
3 years ago
True or False: Outside of The United States, The American Revolution is often seen as an important historical event that brings
gayaneshka [121]

Answer:

True.

Explanation:

A little exlanation is needed here, indeed, because of the words "bring back democracy." In the late 18th century, there were no democratic governments in the world. There were monarchies, autocracies, empires. So, the American republic was a pioneering experiment. In very broad terms , it is a restoration of democracy if you go back to ancient Greece, where one limited democracy existed in Athens and other city-states. But it is right , for many freedom fighters around the world, the American Revolution was an inspiration and a model to follow.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What is the difference between the central plains and the great plains?
    5·1 answer
  • An election by voters from an entire area (state or county) instead of from a specific district is called a(n)
    8·1 answer
  • In 2009, traffic collisions killed __________ people in the United States. A. 10,839 B. 16,118 C. 30,797 D. 62,797
    14·2 answers
  • When did people find out about multiple types of cancer?
    9·1 answer
  • Most French motives for exploration were for what purposes
    13·2 answers
  • Let the word go forth from this time and place, to friend and foe alike, that the torch has been passed to a new generation of A
    13·2 answers
  • An economic impact of migration in the late 1800s
    6·1 answer
  • Why did ancient Egyptians feel it was important to recognize and worship them?
    5·2 answers
  • Using complete sentences, explain how to draw a double number line using the ratio value . Then, list at least three ratios that
    9·1 answer
  • Why do you think the election of 1800 was so acrimonious and bitter? How does it compare to other highly-contentious elections i
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!