1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
patriot [66]
2 years ago
13

The Siks/Hindus and Muslims did not get along before the state was partitioned True or false

History
2 answers:
jeyben [28]2 years ago
8 0
False i hole you get your question right!
alekssr [168]2 years ago
6 0
False the Hindus and Muslims did get along
You might be interested in
Which culture is correctly matched with the form of writing it used?
Marta_Voda [28]
Mesopotamia - cuneiform.

If that is what you meant.
7 0
2 years ago
Can someone pls tell me why Shi Hunagdi used group punishment... (The Qin dynasty) thanks
kaheart [24]

Answer:

He believed using harsh laws like this would prevent chaos in society

Explanation:

:)

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Explain with detail why the ratification process was much closer than <br> it appear
skelet666 [1.2K]

There was a lot of public discussion in the States over the Constitution's ratification procedure. Nine of the thirteen State legislatures needed to ratify it in order for it to go into force; unanimity was not necessary.

First, three-fourths of state conventions or state legislatures must support each amendment. Getting many states to concur on a long-lasting amendment to the Constitution is exceedingly challenging.

However, it wouldn't be until 1790 that the Constitution would eventually be accepted and ratified by all states. Roadblocks included disagreements about the delegates' authority, anti-federalist phobias, and the absence of a Bill of Rights. However, the new administration's concessions and pledges ultimately resulted in a solution.

To learn more about ratification

brainly.com/question/28246915

#SPJ1

4 0
10 months ago
Is this statement true or false? Examples of artifacts that an archaeologist might use to draw conclusions about people of the p
levacccp [35]

The answer to your question is,

True! Any type of evidence that an archaeologist finds that they assume is from past life will be examined.

-Mabel <3

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Based on the excerpt, which inference can be made?
Margarita [4]

Answer:

It is not C (The older kids are teasing Via.)

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Why is being able to amend the constitution important??
    8·1 answer
  • How was the North American free trade agreement affected Texas
    5·1 answer
  • Why did the Crown pass so-called Intolerable Acts
    5·1 answer
  • By the 1880s most states had outlawed child labor. <br> a. True <br> b. False
    10·1 answer
  • Name the five founding fathers that did not attend the constitutional convention
    15·1 answer
  • The Thirteen original colonies
    8·2 answers
  • What was grant's quaker and peace policy?
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following scenarios would historians identify as having historical continuity
    9·2 answers
  • How are Athenian direct democracy and US representative democracy similar? In both, everyone is allowed to vote. In both, the go
    6·2 answers
  • What were the unfulfilled goals of 5 Europe countries following WWI?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!