Answer:
c) a debit to Petty Cash and a credit to Cash.
Explanation:
According to the golden rule of double of entry that a giver should be credited while a receiver is debited, the cash account is the giver in this case would be credited while the receiver,the petty cash account would be debited on the other hand.
The correct option which corroborates my explain above is option C.
Option A is wrong because the reverse was the case.
Answer:
There is no contract, he has been banned for life
Explanation:
Troy and the casino had no contract. Troy black Ford had no business going back to gamble in the casino because he had already been banned for life for destroying a slot machine. So except this ban had been lifted by prairie meadows, there was no way he could argue that he had a contract and then win the case. Prairie meadows made him no offers so as a result there could be no contract.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
When using the indirect method to prepare the operating section of a statement of cash flows , the gain on sale of land will be deducted from the net income as it has already been included in the net income as the gain on the sales of the land , which was a non cash recognition in the course of the business.
Decrease in receivable means that there was an inflow of cash as some receivables had paid their debts , thus it is added.
The amortization is a non cash expenses that had been deducted which will need to be added back to the net income for the purpose of cash flow.
Answer:
The court ruled against both Americar and Regency Inn, and then Regency Inn won its case against Americar. The nuisance case itself is pretty unpleasant, so it's not worth referring to it.
The fundamentals for the ruling against Americar were that they themselves had drafted the lease agreement and that the clause included in the lease agreement by which they agreed to indemnify Regency Inn was valid. The original lease term had already expired, but Americar continued to lease the offices on a monthly basis. Since they never left the place, the clauses in the original agreement were still valid even though the lease changed to a monthly basis. I.e. if you sign a lease contract and after the original contract is over, you continue to lease the same place, then the clauses from the original contract still apply.
The clause stated that Americar was liable for damages that took place on the leased premises or in their proximity, i.e. the area near their offices. The parking lot was considered to be in the proximity of Americar's offices.
The answer is $100.
Amount she steals= $100
Amount she bought goods= $70
Amount the owner returns as change = $30
Amount owner loses=?
Amount she steals +amount of goods - amount she gives to owner + amount owner returns as change = $100 + $70 - $100 + $30 = $200 - $100 = $100
