Answer:
Kindly check explanation
Step-by-step explanation:
A.)
The problem with the here is that we might have introduced bias into our sample by failing to randomize the assignment of gender. By pacing the male gender in the treatment group and females into the control group, this might spring up a spurious association in our experiment as a result of a possible confounding variable, gender. Therefore, assignment of subject shouldn't be on the basis of gender.
2.)
Using a coin toss in placing subjects into groups will give a good random assignment, however, since only ten subjects are available and of which 5 will be placed into each group, there is no certainty that there will be equal number of heads and tails during the 10 flips. Alternatively, a random selection of the name of the 10 subjects could be chosen from a raffle.
3.)
Each batch of rat might be homogenous and hence will affect our experiment and definitely our conclusion. It would be best to assign rats from each batch to all treatment groups in other to obtain a good random design
Largest to Smallest:-
First lets write all the numbers down. 45, 94, 85, 490, 85, 93, 85, 035, 85.
035 is 35.
So lets order them now.
The biggest number is 490 and smallest is 35 (035).
490 - 94 - 93 - 85 - 85 - 85 - 85 - 035 (35)
Answer:
y = - 2x + (1/2 38) + 2 = y = -2x + 19x + 2 at any second and y = -2x^2 / 2 + 19/2 + 2/2 = <u>- x^2 + 19/2 + 2 </u>= - x (4) + 19/2(4) + 1 = -4+ 38 + 1 = 35 seconds
Step-by-step explanation: We see that 38-2ft = 36ft and y intercept = 2 and then -2x allows us to represent the starting point 2 as -2 (1) to allow a descend to our back to 0 for y one we find y intercept we know - x^2 is our simplified equation and an input into this to find the static and slowed descend back to 0 if you keep inputting at 5 and 6 you see the equation speed up Anyway at (4) substitute = 4 seconds we divide our simplified equation a = -x2 into a b c and divide each by 2 before working out the<u> </u><u>decline</u> of the equation<u> (as equation still represents all ascending and descending) </u>for the 4th second as the height was <u>already said to be at its max at 38 feet see equation in answer to find 4 as substitute for x </u>
Answer:
P value is 0.1932
conclusion is that find value P greater than hypothesis test at the 0.05 level
Step-by-step explanation:
Given data
registered organ donors P = 40%
sample n = 200
registered organ donors x = 74
hypothesis test α = 0.05
to find out
P-value and state a conclusion
solution
we take a trail p less than 40 % i.e 0.40
so p = x/n
p = 74 / 200 = 0.37
so we find here Z value i.e
Z = p - P / √(PQ/n)
here Q = 1-p = 1-0.40 = 0.60
so Z = 0.37 - 0.40 / √(0.40×0.60/200)
Z = - 0.866
so p value for Z (-0.866) from z table
P value is 0.1932
and conclusion is that find value P greater than hypothesis test at the 0.05 level
Your answer will be x= -4y/3 + 55/3
