The exclusion of gain on the sale of a personal residence may be elected only by a taxpayer who has owned three or more residences if the tax payer uses the installment method to sale of property.
Explanation:
The present law provides the recognition of roll over and gain on the sale of tax payer. This rule is applied to the purchase price of the replacement residence that equals or exceeds the sale price of residence sold.
The bill has the benefits of exclusion for the individuals who receive compensation from U.S or other agency.
The taxpayers exclude all the portion of gain from the involuntary conversion of principal residence if they had ownership and requirements.
Answer:
B. It would not shift the curve; it would be represented by moving from a point inside the curve toward the curve.
Explanation:
Here the falling in unemployment represents that there is a movement with respect to the resources that are fully employed.
In this the unemployment means that it could be occured inner side of the PPF but if there is an increase, so the point of the production would be moved inner of the PPF to the PPF
Therefore the option B is correct
Answer:
Under allocation= 1,000 underallocated
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Dukes Corporation used a predetermined overhead rate this year of $2 per direct labor-hour, based on an estimate of 20,000 direct labor-hours to be worked during the year. Actual costs and activity during the year were: Actual manufacturing overhead cost incurred $ 38,000 Actual direct labor-hours worked 18,500
Allocated MOH= Estimated manufacturing overhead rate* Actual amount of allocation base
Allocated MOH= 2*18,500= $37,000
Real overhead= 38,000
Over/under allocation= real MOH - allocated MOH
Under allocation= 38,000 - 37,000= 1,000 underallocated
Answer:
He invested $400 in the account with interest at 6%, while investing $1600 in the account with interest at 7%.
Explanation:
Given that Michael Perez deposited $ 2000 in two different accounts that granted an interest of 6% and 7% per year respectively, and that at the end of the year he obtained $ 136 in interest, to determine how much money he invested in each account it is necessary to perform the following calculation:
2000 = 100
136 = X
((136 x 100) / 2000) = X
13600/2000 = X
6.8 = X
Thus, the benefits obtained were 6.8% per year. Thus, the annual 7% of the account with the highest interest rate must subtract a 0.2% yield, with which Michael Perez invested 2/10 parts of his money in the account with interest at 6% and 8/10 in the account with interest at 7%.
Thus, in the account with interest at 6% he invested $ 400, while in the account with interest at 7% he invested $ 1600.