<u>"confirming that it is not an online source" </u>is wrong. The problem is not the fact the source is online, but if it's credible.
<u>"determining whether or not it is well-known" </u>well-known sources might still be wrong. Being known does not make something true.
<u>"d. determining whether it is a secondary source" </u>again, it has nothing at all to do with the validity of the source.
So the answer is:
b. checking its conclusions against other sources
The best way is to check the source and compare to different ones that talk about the same subject. Comparing different conclusions of different authors and seeing different points of view about the same thing is often the best way.
Answer:What my answer is to this question is that you can learn this in environmental Science and i know this from experience!!!
Explanation: I know this because I am in high school and I go to a College Prep Charter School
Answer:
historian collect and evaluate information from many primary sources to answer questions about historical events a process known as the historical method
Drought and damage to farm land.
George Fitzhugh. He was a racist and was pro-slavery, not an abolitionist in any shape or form.
