Yes, this makes Mexican workers more cost-effective than U.S. workers, keeping other things constant.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Minimum wage is the amount of money that an employee will get from his employer for working for an hour. This adds up to the total cost of the goods produced by the workers.
If the minimum wage of the workers in Mexico is less than the minimum wage received by the workers in the United States, it means that they are more cost effective and will lead to the production of the goods at a cheaper rate, keeping other things constant in the production process.
Answer: d. Josh, who has just been told he has cancer and whose wife announces she is leaving him when he tells her announces she is leaving him when he tells her the news
Explanation:
Active transport requires ATP for moving materials
Answer:
To establish how the setting creates obstacles for the characters
.
Explanation:
Ernest H. Griffin's "The Oasis: Africa," tells a thrilling story of a desert journey and how rough and severe nature can be to travelers in a desert. Deprived of the basic necessities especially water, the discovery of an oasis in the desert brought a huge relief to the characters.
The author starts the story by narrating or describing the landscape of the place where they are starting their journey. Normally, settings or in this case, descriptions of the landscape allows the readers to get a sense of where the story takes place. Moreover, the inclusion of details about the hardships that the narrator encounters also adds to this image of what the scene most looks like. And so, this <u>reveals how the setting creates the obstacles that the characters will be met with.
</u>
One particular organization that fought for racial equality was the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) founded in 1909. For about the first 20 years of its existence, it tried to persuade Congress and other legislative bodies to enact laws that would protect African Americans from lynchings and other racist actions. Beginning in the 1930s, though, the NAACP's Legal Defense and Education Fund began to turn to the courts to try to make progress in overcoming legally sanctioned discrimination. From 1935 to 1938, the legal arm of the NAACP was headed by Charles Hamilton Houston. Houston, together with Thurgood Marshall, devised a strategy to attack Jim Crow laws by striking at them where they were perhaps weakest—in the field of education. Although Marshall played a crucial role in all of the cases listed below, Houston was the head of the NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund while Murray v. Maryland and Missouri ex rel Gaines v. Canada were decided. After Houston returned to private practice in 1938, Marshall became head of the Fund and used it to argue the cases of Sweat v. Painter and McLaurin v. Oklahoma Board of Regents of Higher Education.