The franchise relationship is defined by the contract between the franchisor and the franchisee. The franchise contract specifies the terms and conditions of the franchise and spells out the rights and duties of the franchisor and the franchisee.
If either party fails to perform its contractual duties, that party may be subject to a lawsuit for breach of contract. If a fran-chisee is induced to enter into a franchise contract by the franchisor's fraudulent misrepresentation, the franchisor may be liable for damages. Generally, statutes and the case law governing franchising tend to emphasize the importance of good faith and fair dealing in franchise relationships.
Answer:
The Franchise Contract
Explanation:
The franchise contract is contract between the franchisor and the franchisee. It defines the terms and conditions as well as the rights and duties of both parties in the contract. Each party will be liable for damages if there is a breach of contract stemming from breach of duty or rights or terms of the contract. There are statutes and laws that govern franchising in most countries ensuring fair franchise contractual relationships
Answer:
D
Explanation:
Im pretty sure it's this because they didn't have what we have now to learn about things they were unsure of.
Answer:
He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good. 2. He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.
Explanation:
Answer: The answer is wants.
Scarcity is the condition of not having enough goods and services to satisfy everyone's wants.
Explanation:
Scarcity refers to limitless or limited resources to satisfy human wants. It is a fundamental economic problem because the available resources are not enough to satisfy human wants. Scarcity makes people, individuals or humans to take decisions on how to efficiently allocate resources so that their basic needs can be satisfied.
The Federalists are advocates who think the American foreign policy should favor British interests while the Democratic-Republicans are advocates who wanted to strengthen ties with the French.
The Federalist Party was headed by Alexander Hamilton and John Adams and they called for more national government control. They believed that with the national government having more power than states, they could create a better and more equal United States of America. One of the things they called for was national government regulation of the trade between states. The Federalists believed that such regulation would better protect the rights of states which were otherwise small or in a poorer position to negotiate.
The Federalists and the Anti-Federalists argued primarily over the issue of the strength of the national government in the newly formed United States. The Federalists sought to strengthen the power of the national government whereas the Anti-Federalists sought to strengthen the power of state governments.
Read more about Federalist
brainly.com/question/26151989
#SPJ1