1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
fomenos
3 years ago
5

Which winning presidential candidate received the fewest number of

History
1 answer:
cluponka [151]3 years ago
4 0

Answer: Donald Trump 2016.

Explanation:Of the 58 presidential elections in the history of the United States, 53 of the winners took both the Electoral College and the popular vote. But in five incredibly close elections—including those for two of the past three presidents—the winner of the Electoral College was in fact the loser of the popular vote.

Here's how that can happen: The U.S. president and vice president aren’t elected by direct popular vote. Instead, Article II, section I of the Constitution provides for the indirect election of the nation’s highest offices by a group of state-appointed “electors.” Collectively, this group is known as the Electoral College.To win a modern presidential election, a candidate needs to capture 270 of the 538 total electoral votes. States are allotted electoral votes based on the number of representatives they have in the House plus their two senators. Electors are apportioned according to the population of each state, but even the least populous states are constitutionally guaranteed a minimum of three electors (one representative and two senators).

This guaranteed minimum means that states with smaller populations end up having greater representation in the Electoral College per capita. Wyoming, for example, has one House representative for all of its roughly 570,000 residents. California, a much more populous state, has 53 representatives in the House, but each of those congressmen and women represent more than 700,000 Californians.

Since most states (48 plus Washington, D.C.) award all of their electoral votes to the person who wins the statewide popular vote, it’s mathematically possible to win more electoral votes while still losing the popular vote. For example, if one candidate wins by large percentages in a handful of very populous states, for example, they’ll probably win the popular vote. But if their opponent wins a bunch of smaller states by tight margins, he or she could still win the Electoral College. That’s basically what happened in 2016.

Take a look at all five times a president won the White House while losing the popular vote.

This is the first of two occasions when the man ultimately elected president first lost both the popular vote and the electoral vote.

Back in 1824, there were four contenders for the presidency, all members of the same Democratic-Republican party: Andrew Jackson, John Quincy Adams, William Crawford and Henry Clay.

When the votes were tallied, Andrew Jackson won a plurality of both the popular vote and the Electoral College. But to win the presidency, you need more than a plurality (the most electoral votes), you need a majority (more than half), and Jackson was 32 electoral votes shy of the mark.

You might be interested in
Please help me answering this?
mylen [45]
what are you trying to answer
6 0
3 years ago
According to the Missouri Compromise of 1820, Missouri would enter the United States as a slave state and Maine would enter the
const2013 [10]
That’ll be true. the U.S. Congress passed a law that admitted Missouri to the Union as a slave state and Maine as a free state





8 0
4 years ago
Chaldean king Nabopolassar led a revolt against the_______<br> to reclaim his kingdom.
Degger [83]

Answer: Assyrians

Explanation:

Nebopolassar led a revolt in 672 BC against the Assyrians and was crowned king of babylon.

5 0
3 years ago
What was a result of the english bill of rights?
artcher [175]

C. The best answer I can think of

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which branch of the US government includes the Supreme Court has the responsibility of interpreting the law
bekas [8.4K]
That would be the Judicial branch
8 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Explain the details involded in the mummifacation process
    15·2 answers
  • What arguments against imperialism have been raised by ferry's critics? how does he counter them?
    12·1 answer
  • List cold war trouble spots in iran,guatemala,egypt,and hungary.for each,write a newspaper headline that summarizes the us role
    9·1 answer
  • Leadership characteristics of sultan muzaffar shah
    9·1 answer
  • I WILL MArK BRAINIEST ,PLEASE ANSWER ASAP, please.
    10·1 answer
  • Describe how the us was operating under theory of containment with the crisis in cuba
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the these was an outcome of the Industrial Revolution?
    14·1 answer
  • What was the Avignon Papacy? Why did it occur? Evaluate its importance.
    5·1 answer
  • Can you write what you analys and evaluate of honor crimes happening in other parts of the world?
    7·1 answer
  • How did exploration change the African slave trade?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!