1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
fomenos
3 years ago
5

Which winning presidential candidate received the fewest number of

History
1 answer:
cluponka [151]3 years ago
4 0

Answer: Donald Trump 2016.

Explanation:Of the 58 presidential elections in the history of the United States, 53 of the winners took both the Electoral College and the popular vote. But in five incredibly close elections—including those for two of the past three presidents—the winner of the Electoral College was in fact the loser of the popular vote.

Here's how that can happen: The U.S. president and vice president aren’t elected by direct popular vote. Instead, Article II, section I of the Constitution provides for the indirect election of the nation’s highest offices by a group of state-appointed “electors.” Collectively, this group is known as the Electoral College.To win a modern presidential election, a candidate needs to capture 270 of the 538 total electoral votes. States are allotted electoral votes based on the number of representatives they have in the House plus their two senators. Electors are apportioned according to the population of each state, but even the least populous states are constitutionally guaranteed a minimum of three electors (one representative and two senators).

This guaranteed minimum means that states with smaller populations end up having greater representation in the Electoral College per capita. Wyoming, for example, has one House representative for all of its roughly 570,000 residents. California, a much more populous state, has 53 representatives in the House, but each of those congressmen and women represent more than 700,000 Californians.

Since most states (48 plus Washington, D.C.) award all of their electoral votes to the person who wins the statewide popular vote, it’s mathematically possible to win more electoral votes while still losing the popular vote. For example, if one candidate wins by large percentages in a handful of very populous states, for example, they’ll probably win the popular vote. But if their opponent wins a bunch of smaller states by tight margins, he or she could still win the Electoral College. That’s basically what happened in 2016.

Take a look at all five times a president won the White House while losing the popular vote.

This is the first of two occasions when the man ultimately elected president first lost both the popular vote and the electoral vote.

Back in 1824, there were four contenders for the presidency, all members of the same Democratic-Republican party: Andrew Jackson, John Quincy Adams, William Crawford and Henry Clay.

When the votes were tallied, Andrew Jackson won a plurality of both the popular vote and the Electoral College. But to win the presidency, you need more than a plurality (the most electoral votes), you need a majority (more than half), and Jackson was 32 electoral votes shy of the mark.

You might be interested in
The text below was written in 1918: "Your Honor, years ago I recognized my kinship with all living beings, and I made up my mind
ExtremeBDS [4]
He sympathises with the working class but is from the upper classes
5 0
3 years ago
How did the invention of the cotton gin in 1793 affect the use of slave labor in the South? A) Although the cotton gin affected
allsm [11]
The answer would be C.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was francesco petrarch famous for
marusya05 [52]

Answer:

Petetrarch is most famous for his Canzoniere, a collection of vernacular poems about Laura, the woman the speaker loves for most of his life, but cannot have her.

7 0
2 years ago
Which two powers guide much of the daily work of congress?
erastova [34]
The answer is Commerce and taxing
6 0
3 years ago
HELP!!!!!! 25 POINTS!!!!
tester [92]

The main purpose of the Fourteen Points was to outline a strategy for ending the war. He set out specific goals that he wanted to achieve through the war. If the United States was going to fight in Europe and soldiers were going to lose their lives, he wanted to establish exactly what they were fighting for. Through this speech and the Fourteen Points, Wilson became the only leader of the countries fighting in the war to publicly outline his war goals.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • They started the first African American newspaper,
    14·1 answer
  • Indicate whether the italicized clause is an independent clause or a subordinate clause.Do you think Professor Sullivan will ask
    7·1 answer
  • During the Gilded Age, reform laws regarding the government regulation of business were?
    11·1 answer
  • The Bhagavad Gita, which means Song of God, is a sacred poem for followers of which of these belief systems?
    8·2 answers
  • Who led an army to capture southern italy
    8·1 answer
  • How did the Soviet policy of glasnost contribute to the breakup of the Soviet
    13·1 answer
  • Teotihuacán is located in
    5·2 answers
  • Which is the best description of the living conditions for many of the immigrants of the 1800's? Select one: a. Most lived in de
    12·2 answers
  • True or False: Anti-federalists wanted centralized federal government power.
    14·1 answer
  • What were the 4 effects that World War 2 had on the United States Homefront?​
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!