Answer:
The regular workers was prospering the extent that residents were concerned.
Likewise with any modern insurgency, it was the same in the United States of America, a country that was prospering at the times and firmly building up, that there would be another class of specialists who needed to do the modest assignments noone else needed to do yet were required to be done on the off chance that they needed to have an effective industrializaiton of their nation.
Therefore the appropriate response is the average workers.
<u>Commoners in Hinduism as warriors:</u>
The commoners in Hinduism can become warriors and this does not make them to move up in the caste system.
Neither of the given statements fits to warriors. Anyone can become a warrior and this is not based on the caste system. In Hinduism, the people are grouped according to their habitation.
They had a clear cut vision in grouping that one who imparts knowledge is Brahmins, one who fights and protects people from enemies are Kshatriyas, one who does business is vaishyas and finally one who does the hard labor is shudras.
The warrior from any one of the groups will always remain in the same cult there won’t get upgraded or downgraded in the caste system which is derived according to the habitation. In this grouping, there is no discrimination every individual will practice their system of life.
True.
This was evidenced by the Neutrality Acts of 1930s.
The 1st Neutrality Act was the prohibition of export of "arms, ammunition, and implements of war" from the U.S. to foreign nations at war. The act requires arms manufacturer in the United States to apply for export license before they can exports arms to foreign nations.
The Neutrality Act of 1937 forbids U.S. Citizens from boarding belligerent ships. American ships were also prevented by this Act to transport arms to belligerents even if the arms were made outside the U.S. The Act also gave the President the right to bar belligerent ships from all U.S. waters.
However, there was an exception to this Act. Belligerent nations were allowed, at the discretion of the president, to acquire any items except arms from the United States, as long as they immediately pay for these items and carry them on non-American ships. This provision is called the "cash-and-carry".
The final Neutrality Act was passed on November 1939. This act lifted the arms embargo and put all trade with belligerent nations under the terms of "cash-and-carry". The ban on loans and barring of American ships transporting goods to belligerent nations still remain in effect.
Answer:no cuz the White Hous woulde send it to the Office of the Federal Register
Explanation:
