Answer:
51/28
Step-by-step explanation:
Start by making common denominators.
<u>7</u> <u>2</u>
4 4
Now subtract the two.
7 - 2 = <u>5</u>
4
Now you have to make common denominators for the second part, 4/7
<u>16</u> + <u>35</u> = <u>51</u>
28 28 28
brainliest is nice ig
Answer:
The answer is 18.2.
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
AC ≅ AE
Step-by-step explanation:
According to the SAS Congruence Theorem, for two triangles to be considered equal or congruent, they both must have 2 corresponding sides that are of equal length, and 1 included corresponding angle that is of the same measure in both triangles.
Given that in ∆ABC and ∆ADE, AB ≅ AD, and <BAC ≅ DAE, <em>the additional information we need to prove that ∆ABC ≅ ADE is AC ≅ AE. </em>This will satisfy the SAS Congruence Theorem. As there would be 2 corresponding sides that are congruent, and 1 corresponding angle in both triangles that are congruent to each other.
The answer is c cause the answer is 16,741.55ft^2 and c is the closest to it
Answer:
The proof contains a simple direct proof, wrapped inside the unnecessary logical packaging of a proof by contradiction framework.
Step-by-step explanation:
The proof is rigourous and well written, so we discard the second answer.
This is not a fake proof by contradiction: it does not have any logical fallacies (circular arguments) or additional assumptions, like, for example, the "proof" of "All the horses are the same color". It is factually correct, but it can be rewritten as a direct proof.
A meaningful proof by contradiction depends strongly on the assumption that the statement to prove is false. In this argument, we only this assumption once, thus it is innecessary. Other proofs by contradiction, like the proof of "The square root of 2 is irrational" or Euclid's proof of the infinitude of primes, develop a longer argument based on the new assumption, but this proof doesn't.
To rewrite this without the superfluous framework, erase the parts "Suppose that the statement is false" and "The fact that the statement is true contradicts the assumption that the statement is false. Thus, the assumption that the statement was false must have been false. Thus, the statement is true."
