1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lisabon 2012 [21]
3 years ago
11

The Sons of Liberty protested the Tea Act by dumping British tea into the Boston Harbor as a reaction to taxation without repres

entation. Which answer choice is a way that Parliament responded?
History
1 answer:
Sladkaya [172]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Parliament responded by enforcing the Coercive Acts of 1774.

Explanation:

When the Boston Tea Party took place, Parliament was furious. Hence, they passed the Coercive Acts of 1774, which included 4 different statements:

The Boston Port Act stated that until damages from the Boston Tea Party were paid off, the Boston Ports would be closed.

The Massachusetts Government Act restricted Massachusetts, stating that democratic town meetings turned the government council into an appointed body.

The Administration of Justice Act stated that any British Official was immune to criminal prosecution in Massachusetts.

The Quartering Act required colonists to house British soldiers on demand, and possibly using their private homes as a last resort.

Those are the 4 Technical Acts of the Coercive Acts of 1774, but there's a 5th act that correlates.

The  Quebec Act extended freedom of of worship to Catholics in Canada, as well as letting Canadians carry on with their judicial system. It was added to the Coercive Acts of 1774 later after the Acts were passed, and it enraged the Sons of Liberty that much more.

You might be interested in
O que Colombo queria alcançar com sua viagem?.
VikaD [51]

Answer:

O objetivo de suas viagens era encontrar uma passagem para a Ásia navegando para o oeste. Sem nunca realmente cumprir esta missão, suas explorações incluíram principalmente o Caribe e partes da América Central e do Sul, todas as quais já eram habitadas por grupos nativos.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Hitler’s views concerning the Jews and other groups he hated were immoral and insane. Why do you think so many Germans followed
hodyreva [135]

German people, whether Nazis or not, truly held to the idea that Germany was fighting for its freedom, even for its actual existence. But for Hitler, WWII was not about conquering former German territory in Poland or about consolidating nationalism for Germans living outside Germany. WWII was about the creation of a new racial order, one of German superiority over Slavs and Jews.

There was a strong politization of Germans after World War I. Once Hitler came to power in 1933, brainwash and seduction were the methods to reach German people. Even though questions of race, authority and loyalty were regularly deliberated, and only a minority became absolutely Nazis, most people were in agreement with the premises of the regime, including the confinement of German Jews. While most Germans had little idea about the Holocaust, this support made them accomplices of Hilter's "final solution".


5 0
3 years ago
How did Charlemagne unite his Kingdom ( I will mark brainliest )
8090 [49]

Answer:

mission to unite all Germanic peoples into one kingdom

4 0
2 years ago
URGENT NEEDS TO BE DONE BY TODAY!!!!!!!!!!!!! Drawing a Conclusion Was the boycott by the colonists successful? Explain in a par
Zinaida [17]
Yes the boycott was successful due to that fact that the taxes on the colonies were so high that the British depended a lot on tax of the exports and merchandise that they were producing. But because of the boycott they weren’t becoming as financially stable as they should of been. Because of these taxes and boycotting it would later lead to the American Revolution
4 0
3 years ago
What were the three reasons that nixon gave for refusing to turn over the white house tapes?
Allushta [10]
In short he argued that, it was purely an executive branch conflict not a judicial one.
it wasfor the president not the courts to discover the scope of the executive privilege.
the need for executive confidentiality justified the application of privilege in this case.
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Where was portuguese trading focused in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries?
    10·1 answer
  • According to the above Psychologist, what are the three divisions of the unconscious mind?
    14·1 answer
  • Were groups that advocated the use of violence in the 1960s justified in doing so? Why or why not?
    15·1 answer
  • In 1973, the major oil-producing nations of the world declared an oil embargo. The price of oil, a key source of energy, increas
    6·1 answer
  • Which leader made the phrase black power popular in the mid-1960s?
    10·2 answers
  • Kada je poceo l svjetski rat​
    14·1 answer
  • Who translated Ramayana into bengali​
    12·1 answer
  • How are the principles of separation of powers and checks and balances related?​
    13·1 answer
  • HURRY AND ANSWER!!!!What was one effect of the Diaspora on the Jewish people?
    7·2 answers
  • How is the principle of the social contract reflected in the Declaration of Independence of the articles of confederation?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!