Answer:
Because it is calling the boy Intelligent and determined without any facts to backup the statement. Therefore it is just what the author intreprets of the man.
Hope this helps
Plz mark me as Brainliest
C) But even this is admitting more than is true, for I answer roundly, that America would have flourished as much, and probably much more, had no European power had any thing to do with her.
In Option C, Paine is stating that America would actually have been better off if it was not controlled by Britain. He says that being under British control actually hindered America's progress and kept it from flourishing even more. Options A and B both give arguments for America needing Britain in order to thrive. In Option A it states that a connection with Britain is important for America to maintain its happiness. In Option B it compares America to a child. It states that if a child can survive on milk alone then it should never have meat. Therefore America should only need Britain. We can tell Paine sees this as preposterous, but this initial idea does not support the claim. Option D shows how America will always have commerce but Britain is only concerned with eating. This alone is not enough for strong evidence.
A conflict in a story creates and drives the plot and story toward. The conflict in a novel is usually something happening between two “people” or forces. If you can check my page and answer some of my questions that would be sweet.
The answer is D. The country will fall apart without it.
The sentence that is punctuated correctly is option A. On her Mediterranean cruise, Mamie visited Barcelona, Spain; Nice, France; and Pisa, Italy. A semicolon is used in this sentence because more than one of the units in the series are using the punctuation mark commas.
