Answer:
because the media is effects the vewiers opinions.
The answer is: Murmuring ;)<span />
"They reduce disposable income" explains how contractionary policies can hamper economic growth
<h3>Further explanation
</h3>
Disposable income is the amount of money that households have,available for spending and saving after income taxes accounted.
Expansionary fiscal policy is an increase in government expenditures, also a decrease in taxes that causes the government's budget deficit to increase or its budget surplus to decrease. In short, expansionary fiscal policy boosts economic growth by lowering interest rates.
Whereas contractionary fiscal policy is defined as a decrease in government expenditures, also an increase in taxes that causes the government's budget deficit to decrease or its budget surplus to increase. Contractionary money policy is used to combat inflation. In short, contractionary fiscal policy hamper economic growth by increasing interest rates.
Contractionary policy increases the cost of borrowing. It can decreases GDP and dampens inflation, but also leads to reduced disposable income. Another negative side effect is it makes an increase in the unemployment rate. Disposable income itself is the amount of money that households have, available for spending and saving after income taxes accounted.
<h3>Learn more</h3>
- Learn more about hamper economic growth brainly.com/question/11698157
<h3>Answer details</h3>
Grade: 9
Subject: social studies
Chapter: hamper economic growth
Keywords: hamper economic growth
Answer:
King Philip II of Spain was, personality-wise, less cautious than Elizabeth I of England. He sought a more active foreign policy, in part because he had to, since he was not only a king, but the emperor of a huge Spanish Empire that included territories all over the world.
King Philip was a devout catholic who saw himself as a defender of the Pope, and as a leader of the counter-reformation. His anti-protestanism was one of his motivations for invading England in 1588.
Elizabeth I was more reserved, in part because he did not have as much power as Philip II. She was the king of a small island-country, not the empress of a transoceanic empire. She was relatively tolerant of other religiouns while being anglican herself.
She did not had a lot military success until the Anglo-English war when her army defeated the Spanish Armada.
Answer:Sorry I didn’t write this in the comment but it didn’t let me but
Explanation:so some questions I would like to meet..? Lol
