Basic argument of the Federalists for ratification <span>of the constitution is that it would give the central government more powers which was essential for the survival of the United States. A stronger central government would improve the economy, foreign relations, and would give the government more power to levy taxes and execute laws, as well as the power to create a strong military without permission from the states.
Arguments against the ratification would be used by ANTI-Federalists, NOT Federalists.
Those arguments against ratification were that the central government would get too powerful and strip the average citizens of their rights. Other problems that were brought forth were the states' representation in the government. Eventually, the Bill of Rights was added to the Constitution and the anti-Federalists were less apposed to it.
</span><span>
</span>
The effect of the industrial revolution in the early 1800s was: per capita income increased
Industrial revolution caused a massive increase in production efficiency that increased the sales of the majority of the factories within united states, This contributed to the total national income for United States
The factors that made it difficult for Eastern Europe to improve its water quality were outdated sewer systems, raw water quality, worn-out water utilities and unskilled employees. So we can say that four options given in the question fits the bill perfectly. These basic infrastructural reasons were responsible for being a hurdle towards improving the water quality. <span />
Amendments can and have been carried against the government.
An amendment is like a change in a document... for example the 10 amendments of the US. They are like additions to legal documents.
