I believe the answer is <span>C:putting particular emphasis on an object in a story
Putting particular emphasis on the object will make the object more relevant and make readers could understand the correlation between whats written in the story and the object.
Doing something like repeating objects throughout a text will only make it abundant and most readers will choose to ignore it.</span>
It is B because the other answers can’t be it
The question is about Organizational Pattern for Speech Writing. Some of the patterns are:
- Cause and Effect Pattern
- Problem/Solution Pattern
- Spatial or Geographical Pattern.
<h3>What is Cause and Effect Pattern?</h3>
When you use this pattern, your ideas will be arranged into two categories the problems to be examined and the causes of such problems.
Problem solution Pattern on the other hand looks at the ideas relating to the problems you have been given to discuss and the solution. This pattern is very common with people in government and political offices.
<h3 /><h3>
Spatial and Geographical Speech pattern </h3>
This type of speech looks at how things are arranged in physical space. It is better to use this format when your speech will be delivered in different exclusive locations.
See the link below for more about Organizational Pattern for Speech Writing:
brainly.com/question/4615666
A. Ancient ruins
B.open-air cinema
C. Green space
D. Skatepark
E. Leisure facilities
F.city center
G. Pedestrian walk way
H. Bike lane
I. Industrial site
J. Sports stadium
This question is incomplete. Here is the complete question:
Read this thesis statement: "<em>Heart of Darkness</em> plunges the narrator into the depths of the Congo." What is wrong with it?:
A) It is too narrow.
B) It is a plot summary.
C) It is too obvious.
D) It is not supported by the text.
Answer:
The correct answer is option A) It is too narrow.
Explanation:
As we know, this story is narrated by the protagonist, Charlie Marlow, who tells us of the journey he made going up a tropical river to locate a certain Kurtz, an elusive and legendary explorer who, according to his superiors, seems to have entrenched himself deep inside from the jungle. Soon the journey turns into a multi-troubled journey, with mystery and degradation growing as the legend of Lord Kurtz enlarges and takes shape.
The novel is based on a true story in the life of Conrad, who sailed up the Congo River as a ship captain in 1890 while working for the SGB company. There, amid the exploitation and genocide that the settlers carried out in the Congo Free State - the private preserve of King Leopold II of Belgium - Conrad was truly traumatized, wanting to relate the horror of his experience in a book in which, on the other hand, and despite the parallels between author and protagonist, no real places or characters are mentioned.
Just using the phrase<em> "plunges the narrator into the depths of the Congo"</em> is too vague to describe the actual plot. Therefore, answer A is correct.
