Ans : A and F
Step-by-step explanation:
<h3>
Solution (a):</h3>
- Area of rectangle = LB
- => Area of rectangle = 18 x 36
- => Area of rectangle = 648 in²
<h3>
</h3><h3>
Solution (b):</h3>
<u>Since the two triangles are equal (as said in the question):</u>
- => Area of triangles: 2(1/2 x 6 x 18)
- => Area of triangles: 6 x 18
- => Area of triangles: 108 in²
<h3 /><h3>Solution (c):</h3>
<u>Subtract the area of the triangles from the area of the rectangle.</u>
- 648 - 108 = Area of trapezoid
- => 540 in² = Area of trapezoid
Answer: no it does not.
Step-by-step explanation: because when you have a number that has x as a variable, you cant add or subtract those numbers together when both numbers have different variables.
This question is not complete
Complete Question
Sherry claims that the expression 1/x will always be equivalent to a repeating decimal whenever x is an odd number greater than 1.
Which of these values of x will prove Sherry's claim is false?
Answer:
When x = 5
Step-by-step explanation:
Sherry claims that the expression 1/x will always be equivalent to a repeating decimal whenever x is an odd number greater than 1.
Examples of odd numbers greater than 1 : 3, 5, 7, 9, 11 ....
We would put these odd numbers to test
a) When x = 3
= 1/3 = 0.3333333333
b) When x = 5
= 1/5 = 0.2
c) When x = 7
= 1/7 = 0.142857142
d) When x = 9
= 1/9 = 0.1111111111
e) When x = 11
= 1/11 = 0.0909090909
From the above calculation, we can see that the only odd number greater than 1 that will prove Sherry's theory wrong is when x = 5
Therefore, the value of x that will prove Sherry's claim is false is when x = 5
The answer to your question is 0.2