The USA I’m not really sure I’m just guessing
Answer:
D. Endorsed
Explanation:
the suffix ed is a past participle
Answer:
The element that would follow this statement is "text evidence from Niemand's argument"
Explanation:
The question is not complete since it does not provide the complete information, here is the complete information:
Read this passage from Giovanna's evaluation of an argument claiming that climate change is not affected by human
activity.
Niemand's article on climate change in the editorial section of today's newspaper offers a weak argument. His reasoning
consists of little more than unsubstantiated assertions that climate change is not affected by human activity.
In an effective evaluation, which element would follow this statement?
a. a summary of Niemand's claim
b. text evidence from Niemand's argument
c. a restatement of Giovanna's evaluation
d. the name and source of Niemand's article
The process of making an evaluation of an argument as Giovanna is doing with this lines has to support the idea with reliable evidence as to the next part of the information, this makes option B the best answer to describe what is the next step for Giovanna's evaluation as she will present the evidence to deny the counterclaims.
The answer is B. Tan is presenting the example <em>"limited English"</em>, which is just <em>one of many</em> other terms she heard before, to express how bad they seem. Because, when people deem those whose knowledge of the Mother Tongue <em>is not as the native speaker</em>, therefore is limited, they are defining everything as limited, even their speaking perceptions.
