All categories

3 years ago

If Sammy’s broken arm is a hoax, then

English

2 answers:

VLD [36.1K]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

If Sammy's broken arm is a hoax, then his arm is not really broken.

Explanation:

A hoax is just a malicious deception.

Rainbow [258]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

his arm is not really broken

You might be interested in

What is the theme of this living hand by john Keats?

denpristay [2]

<span>'This living hand, now warm and capable' is an oddity amongst John Keats's poetry – indeed, amongst Romantic poetry in general. ... (Fittingly, Keats wrote 'This living hand' on a manuscript page of one of his unfinished poems.) The most likely date for the poem's composition is towards the end of 1819.</span><span>
</span>

4 0

3 years ago

The radio broadcast features interviews with hurricanes victims. Why do you think Cheryl Corley includes these interviews instea

JulsSmile [24]

Answer:

She brought the hurricane victims so the listeners would hear their stories from their perspective.

Explanation:

Cheryl Corley was aware that describing the experiences the victims of the hurricane had from a third person perspective would not accurately convey the horrors the victims experienced so she had to include the interviews of the victims themselves so listeners would better the experience from the first person perspective.

When a story is being narrated in the third person narrative, that is another person describing events from a detached view the emotions are not properly captured and the 0erson simply describes it the way he sees it or thinks it happened. It is not an accurate way of describing events.

When narrating an experience in the first person, the person describes it exactly how it happened to them and how they felt when it was happening and how they felt after the event. It is a description based on the descriptor's experience.

8 0

3 years ago

Help me with my crossword pls

QveST [7]

Answer:

cabinet is the answer

8 0

3 years ago

Match these vocabulary terms with their definitions. Match the items in the left column to the items in the right column. 1 . im

enot [183]

Answer:

1. impetuous - acting suddenly with little thought; impulsive

2. tedious - tiresome; boring; irksome

3. perseverance - the quality of being persistent in the face of difficulties

4. livelihood - means of providing for cost of living

5. stamina - endurance; resistance to fatigue

6. zealot - one of a Jewish sect who struggled openly against Roman rule

7. instability - lack of firmness of purpose; changeableness

Explanation:

1. An impetuous person is someone who acts quickly, without much thought or consideration for what he is about to do;

2. We call tedious something or someone that is monotonous, boring, long or slow;

3. Perseverance is the determination to keep on doing something in spite of difficulties and challenges;

4. Livelihood refers to whatever it is that is necessary to make a living, to secure the necessities of life;

5. If someone's stamina is good, that means that person has great physical and mental endurance, being capable of prolonged effort;

6. A zealot was someone belonging to a Jewish political movement against the Roman Empire;

7. Finally, instability refers to the quality or state of being unstable. It can refer to something physical as well as mental.

4 0

2 years ago

Think about the author's attitude toward the oil spill. Then explain the author's purpose, or reason for writing this editorial.

Natalka [10]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

The author's purpose or reason for writing this editorial was to inform and make people conscious about the terrible oil spill in April 2010in the Gulf of México, with the explosion of a British Petroleum rig. This spill caused so much damage to the ecosystem and the environment of the Gulf of México.

The two details from the text that support the answer are the following. The author, Kate Jackson, writes that the BP company knew about the possibility of an accident of this magnitude but it didn't do anything to prevent it. She said that David Rainey, an executive form British Petroleum, had assured the members of the Senate that the facility had no risk of a spill.

The other detail that supports the answer is that she wrote that the oil industry always had been aware of the dangers of spills but never has done so much to prevent them. Also, people like Robert Bea, an offshore engineer, had warned British Petroleum.

4 0

3 years ago