Answer:
Was based on the ruling that government can limit speech if the speech provokes a "clear and present danger" of substantive evils.
Explanation:
The Supreme Court decision upholding the conviction of a socialist who had urged young men to resist the draft during World War I was based on the ruling that government can limit speech if the speech provokes a "clear and present danger" of substantive evils.
Schenck the socialist party secretary appealed the verdict of the lower court which found him guilty of espionage due to his speeches and leaflets discouraging draft age from drafting into military service during the first world war. The Supreme Court upheld the judgement of the lower court and the limit to what constitutes as freedom of speech was set by the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court judge Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr ruled that government can limit speech if the speech provokes a "clear and present danger" of substantive evils. Schenck was sentenced for espionage.
Market because they are exchanging
.
Answer:
Cherokee
Explanation:
The Indian Removal Act of 1830 implemented by President Andrew Jackson to locate the Native Indians. Cherokee forced to walk, which became known as the Trail of Tears.
The removal could have done in a much more humane way by giving them rights in their land. Assistance in the moving from one place to another by giving coaches, food, and warm cloth in their trail.
Pretty sure it's linked to the rise in dictators. Ex: Hitler, the leader of italy at the time, and in Russia.
<span />