<span>Korea had been under Japanese domination since 1910, and had been very isolationist for most of the centuries before then. During the Japanese occupation, Japan tried to eliminate Korea as a separate country - suppressing their local government and their language, forcing Koreans to take Japanese names, destroying or stealing hundreds of cultural artifacts. When Japan surrendered in 1945 it was forced to give up conquered territories, including Korea.
Hundreds of thousands of Koreans died during WWII, as forced laborers and conscripted soldiers. Perhaps as many as 100,000 Korean girls and women were forced into sexual slavery as "comfort women". By the end of the war, more than 800,000 Japanese colonists were occupying Korea, though the majority of those returned to Japan after the surrender.
When Soviet Russia entered the war against Japan in the few days before Japan surrendered, it claimed the right to occupy some Japanese territories during the transition period to what was supposed to be home rule for former Japanese conquests. Between 1945 and 1948, while the United Nations was trying to help the Koreans set up an independent government, the Soviet Russians were working hard in their occupation zone to set up a communist government in their own image - this led to two Koreas, North and South, which led to the Korean War and the current stalemate between the two Koreas. The partition of Korea into North and South is a direct result of the end of World War II.</span>
Answer:
c. Modify existing legislation to allow exceptions
Explanation:
Congress is responsible for law making, the court interprets the law while the executive enforces the law. Congress can limit the impact of a court ruling by modifying existing laws regarding that issue and include exceptions.
Foe example, if the court rules that an individual must come to work on Saturday despite that day being the day for his/her religious meet as in the case of the Seventh-Day Adventist, the congress can review the laws on that issue and modify it to include exceptions.
A careful reading of the history of the “idea” of family preservation as well as an appraisal of the recent policy context for its adoption—as illuminated by Berry (1997), Schorr (1997), McCroskey and Meezan (1997), and others—suggests that all three explanations—dissensus on values, practice lacunae, and organizational complexities—may to a degree be valid. At a minimum, these and other trenchant commentaries such as those provided recently by Littell and Schuerman (1999) and Halpern (1999) suggest that any discussion of the “practice” of family preservation absent its historical/valuative roots and current organizational and policy context will be incomplete.
That said, this present paper will focus on some of the most vexing challenges of implementing family preservation practice, some of its enduring legacies as a practice modality, and some of the longer range problems in developing practice theory and application that it has illuminated
Answer:
There are mountains in the northern part of georgia
Explanation:
Blue ridge Mountains
Answer:
Disadvantages include: (1) states and local governments compete in "race to the bottom," (2) federalism does not bring people closer to the government, (3) citizens suffer because of inequalities across states, (4) policies in one state may undermine policies in another state, (5) overlap of responsibilities among ...
Explanation:
