Answer:
1.The increase of international trade over the years has been a result of the globalization process. Thus, both consumers and companies can now choose from a wider range of products and services
2.The origin of American economic involvement in the Middle East, particularly with regards to oil, dates back to 1928 with the signing of the Red Line Agreement.
Explanation:
Answer: THEY WERE FEARFUL OF DIVISIONS AND INSTABILITY WITHIN THE AMERICAN SOCIETY.
Explanation:
Other common characteristics are:
- They were older, better established, and resisted radical change.
- They felt that rebellion against the Crown; the legitimate government, was morally wrong.
- They were alienated when the Patriots resorted to violence, such as burning houses and tarring and feathering.
- They wanted to take a middle-of-the-road position and were angry when forced by the Patriots to declare their opposition.
- They had a long-standing sentimental attachment to Britain (often with business and family links).
- They realized that independence was bound to come someday, but wanted to postpone the moment.
- They were cautious and afraid that chaos and mob rule would result.
The classical cultures of the Greek and the Romans are mainly focused on humanism in which the main focus is on the capabilities of a human, and not in any supernatural being. These principles were then applied during the period of Renaissance by prominent artists Leonardo da Vinci and many others.
Answer:
city-states
Explanation:
ancient Mesopotamia's created a government that was a combination of monarchy and democracy. The kingdoms of Sumer were organized into city-states and the Kings ruled each city-states for the gods. They were assisted by priests, scribes, and nobles. But before 3500 BC priests ruled Sumer
Answer:
Explanation:
Hindus believe that if they don't eat meat it minimizes hurting other life forms.
Nonviolence
The principle of nonviolence (ahimsa) applied to animals is connected with the intention to avoid negative karmic influences which result from violence. The suffering of all beings is believed to arise from craving and desire, conditioned by the karmic effects of both animal and human action. The violence of slaughtering animals for food, and its source in craving, reveal flesh eating as one mode in which humans enslave themselves to suffering.[19] Hinduism holds that such influences affect the person who permits the slaughter of an animal, the person who kills it, the person who cuts it up, the person who buys or sells meat, the person who cooks it, the person who serves it up, and the person who eats it. They must all be considered the slayers of the animal.[19] The question of religious duties towards the animals and of negative karma incurred from violence (himsa) against them is discussed in detail in Hindu scriptures and religious law books.
