Answer:
The answer is B. Investment banker.
Explanation:
In the evolution of the internet e-commerce allows people to make transactions online is the event occurred most recently.
<h3>Why e-commerce has grown up so much?</h3>
Today ecommerce has very vast market online and people are likely to sell and purchase the things online rather than going to physical market.
The increase in e-commerce has brought the emergency of online payment of the goods and services in the ecommerce.
Thus, option A is correct.
For more details about e-commerce, click here:
brainly.com/question/14157556
#SPJ1
Both power distance and femininity are negatively related to the Environmental Sustainability Index. False
<h3>What is
Environmental Sustainability?</h3>
Environmental sustainability is described as appropriate contact with the environment that promotes long-term environmental quality while preventing resource depletion or degradation. Environmental sustainability is a method that makes it possible to meet the requirements of the current generation without endangering the ability of future generations to do the same.
The power of the natural environment to renew itself and maintain its viability is really amazing when viewed in that light. For instance, when a tree falls, its decomposition enriches the earth with nutrients. These nutrients provide the right environment so that subsequent saplings can thrive.
Nature has a great capacity to take care of itself when left alone.
To learn more about Environmental Sustainability from the given link:
brainly.com/question/25965560
#SPJ4
Answer:
The correct answer is A) A market share of over 50% from the combined companies
Explanation:
The Clayton Act of 1914 regulates acquisitions and mergers in the United States. This is the legal source that the Justice Deparment would use to approve or disapprove the merger described in the question. It explicitly forbids mergers that result in over 50% of market share, because it consideres a higher percentage than that (a market share from 50% to 99%) to configurate a monopoly.
The merger in the question would result in a 70% market share, way higher than the legal limit, hence it would be denied by the DOJ.
Answer: See explanation
Explanation:
The formula to use here will be:
required rate = risk free rate + beta × (market return - risk free rate).
where,
risk free rate = 5%
beta =0.20.
market return = -30%.
Therefore,
required return = 5% + 0.20 × (-30% + -5%)
= 5% + 0.2(-35%)
= 5% - 7%
= -2%
Therefore, the return on portfolio should have been -2% but the portfolio manager produced a return of −10%
Since -10% is lower than -2%, we can deduce that the claim of the manager is wrong.