Answer:
Can you retype that and I’ll do it?
Step-by-step explanation:
Rewrite the limand as
(1 - sin(<em>x</em>)) / cot²(<em>x</em>) = (1 - sin(<em>x</em>)) / (cos²(<em>x</em>) / sin²(<em>x</em>))
… = ((1 - sin(<em>x</em>)) sin²(<em>x</em>)) / cos²(<em>x</em>)
Recall the Pythagorean identity,
sin²(<em>x</em>) + cos²(<em>x</em>) = 1
Then
(1 - sin(<em>x</em>)) / cot²(<em>x</em>) = ((1 - sin(<em>x</em>)) sin²(<em>x</em>)) / (1 - sin²(<em>x</em>))
Factorize the denominator; it's a difference of squares, so
1 - sin²(<em>x</em>) = (1 - sin(<em>x</em>)) (1 + sin(<em>x</em>))
Cancel the common factor of 1 - sin(<em>x</em>) in the numerator and denominator:
(1 - sin(<em>x</em>)) / cot²(<em>x</em>) = sin²(<em>x</em>) / (1 + sin(<em>x</em>))
Now the limand is continuous at <em>x</em> = <em>π</em>/2, so

Answer:
A. Wavelength
Step-by-step explanation:
I calculated it logically
Answer: D. They are both congruent
Step-by-step explanation:
The only difference in the two shapes is the locations. One shape is located in the 4th (-x, +y) quadrant, while the other shape is located in the 2nd quadrant (+x, -y)
They two shapes are the same size with the same area, so they are both congruent.