Brutus warning to people regarding power was "If the people give up their power, they will never give it."
Why is Brutus worried about granting the federal government the authority?
Because they will be dependent on the federal government, unable to protect themselves, provide for the welfare of their citizens, or manage their own trade.
What are Brutus' main objections?
He held that if state laws were or would be in conflict with the Constitution, they would be ruled void and the state constitutions would be dissolved. State fundraising regulations, according to Brutus, might be repealed by Congress under the Necessary and Proper Clause.
Learn more about the Brutus interaction with the help of the given link:
brainly.com/question/27148534
#SPJ4
The colonists didn't like it because they believed that it infringed on their rights.
-Reference: https://www.enotes.com/homework-help/what-did-writs-assistance-declare-what-was-289693
Answer:
More choice and stable prices for consumers and citizens.
Greater security and more opportunities for businesses and markets.
Improved economic stability and growth.
More integrated financial markets.
A stronger presence for the EU in the global economy.
A tangible sign of a European identity.
Explanation:
Answer:
The Roman Empire
Explanation:
The humanist poets and writers during the Renaissance period sought to reconnect with the text of the Roman Empire. The manuals of the Roman Empire came to be known as classic literary texts. Those who studied Latin classics came to be known as humanists. These humanists like Francesco Petrarca (Petrarch) tried to reconnect with the philosophy of classic that included, human nature and achievements of the past.
Answer:
E). Injustice is so much better than justice that only a fool would choose to be just.
Explanation:
The key idea that Galucon emphasizes is that 'justice itself is not a good idea' and calls it 'self-interested.' He finds the very human nature to be unjust and self-seeking. The humans perpetuates justice only for their consequential good. He rather suggests that perfect unjustness is more pleasant, rational, and better than justice and argues that no individual pursues justice willingly. <u><em>The argument he puts on is that 'if people are given an opportunity to be unjust without any ache, they would propagate it rationally.</em></u>' Thus, <u>option E</u> is the correct answer.
