1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ra1l [238]
3 years ago
10

To what extent was John F. Kennedy's approach to the Cold War different from Harry Truman's? Address both what changed and what

stayed the same?

History
1 answer:
kirza4 [7]3 years ago
6 0
Double check the work
You might be interested in
which type of government does the passage best describes A country is lead by one leader.The leader's decisions cannot be questi
asambeis [7]

Answer:A) Dictatorship

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
why didn't the USSR respond with force to the East German and Polish revolts, as they had back in the 50s and 60s? ​
DochEvi [55]

Answer:

Eric Hobsbawm, the Marxist British historian, wrote a book called The Short Twentieth Century. The 20th Century had been shorter than other centuries because it had begun in 1914 with the outbreak of the First World War and terminated of course early in November 1989 with the fall of the Berlin Wall. The problem however, and of course we historians we like problems, is that everybody knew what we had left behind with the fall of the wall, but nobody knew what we were heading towards. As Douglas Hurd, the British Foreign Secretary at the time, put it, “this was a system [the Cold War], this was a system under which we had lived quite happily for 40 years.” Or as Adam Michnik, again my Polish solidarity intellectual, put it “The worst thing about communism is what comes afterwards.” While our populations were in jubilation in front of the television screens or on the streets of Berlin, governments were, it has to be said, seriously worried about the implications of this unforeseen, uncontrolled and uncontrollable collapse of the Warsaw Pact and the communist system. Tom Wolf, the American author, at the time had a bestseller called the Bonfire of the Vanities and a British MP that I knew at the time famously rephrased that as the ‘bonfire of the certainties.’ All of the reference points with which we’d lived for half a century and which had organized our diplomacy, our military strategy, our ideology, were like as many props that were suddenly pulled from us.

5 0
3 years ago
Major events that led to the start of world war 1
Paladinen [302]

Answer:

\begin{gathered}\huge\bold\blue{Major Events:-} \\ \\ \huge \end{gathered}

  • World War I began after the assassination of Austrian archduke Franz Ferdinand by South Slav nationalist Gavrilo Princip on June 28, 1914.
  • Both Russia and France, which had been humiliated in the Franco-Prussian War of 1870-71, feared the rising power of Germany, which had already formed alliances with Austria-Hungary and Italy. So the two nations decided to join forces for mutual protection as well. It was the start of what would become the Allied side, the Triple Entente, in World War I.
  • This legislation, advocated by Germany’s newly-appointed Secretary of the Imperial Navy, Admiral Alfred von Tirpitz, dramatically expanded the size of Germany’s battle fleet. It was the first of five laws dictating a buildup in which the Germans envisioned building a force that was superior to Britain’s Royal Navy.
  • Under an 1878 treaty, Austria-Hungary was governing Bosnia and Herzegovina, even though technically they were still part of the Ottoman Empire. But after Austro-Hungarian government annexed their territory, the move backfired. The two provinces’ mostly Slavic population wanted to have their own country, while Slavs in nearby Serbia had the ambition of appropriating the provinces themselves.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
which statement was part of an initial draft of the Declaration of Independence, but not part of the final version of the Declar
DanielleElmas [232]
No answer choices for me to pick from
3 0
3 years ago
What elements of Eleanor Roosevelt life made her an extraordinary woman of her time
andreyandreev [35.5K]

Answer:

Her doggedness in fighting for the rights of women and that of the African Americans made her an extraordinary woman of her time.

Explanation:

Eleanor Roosevelt was one of the most influential women in the history of the world, whose illustrious life and advocacy for the rights of women in particular, and the rights of African Americans in general, made her cynosure of hope and a role model to many. Despite being the longest-serving first lady of the United States of America, she campaigned for women's rights and became a great source of inspiration to African American women. She was instrumental in the abolition of child labor and the increase in the minimum wages of women. She also spoke against discrimination and advocated for racial equality and desegregation.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The apparent winner of the election of 1876, with 203 electoral college votes and a quarter of a million more popular votes than
    5·1 answer
  • What was one way that President Franklin D. Roosevelt showed strong leadership qualities during World War II?
    9·1 answer
  • The First Continental Congress decided to do which of the following?
    13·2 answers
  • Why did the cabinet missions failed in 1946?<br>Answer in detail...
    9·1 answer
  • George washington set the precedent of having a group of close advisers. True or False
    5·1 answer
  • What is a connection between Renaissance humanism and today?
    7·2 answers
  • Historians generally consider the Renaissance to be a cultural and intellectual bridge between which two eras?
    10·1 answer
  • What was one characteristic of American imperialism in the late 19th and early 20th centuries?
    13·1 answer
  • If the governor of Georgia vetoes a bill, it can still become law through an override by
    9·1 answer
  • The Road Not Taken
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!